Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, close that protocol! Build the walls around our garden higher! No need to wait for them to actually do something worth defederating over, we just don’t like them!

    This is silly. A major social media network is trying to join the Fediverse and everyone’s keen on stopping it. If Meta does something dirty or damaging, sure, defederate them then. But I was kind of hoping that open protocols would flourish, not just end up as another bunch of balkanized forums and Reddit-likes.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you haven’t noticed them doing dirty or damaging things for the last twenty years, feel free to engage with them.

      There’s more than enough evidence to show their intentions are far from pure.

      • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        How are we supposed to do that when people like you are encouraging admins to defederate which removes any semblance of freedom of choice that you are fucking trying to imply we act upon?

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re a multinational corporation, they don’t need us to host their shit for you to be able to read a goddamn article and learn something.

          If you don’t yet understand that they’re evil that’s on you.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Choose what? If you want to find an instance unscrupulous enough to federate with that company then go for it. Who is stopping you?

              • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                28
                ·
                7 months ago

                People like OP here, begging admin to block it?

                Like are you for real? He’s literally asking them to take my choice away.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  28
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It is always the admins’ choice, that has never been any different. You are free to choose which instance you are part of.

                  This petition changes nothing about that.

                  • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    “We need to defederate from them” is not a petition…

                    Also, you could just choose not to subscribe to them, go to a place where they are defederated, or even just block them yourself with the right apps.

                    That’s a whole lot of choice for you in a platform based around decentralization and user choice.

                    But on the flip side if you just make everyone defederate them, then you’re removing user choice completely just based on your personal feelings on the matter.

                    That doesn’t seem fair to me just because you personally hate something that I don’t.

            • Zorque@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              Then feel free to go to threads or somewhere that does federate with them. You don’t have to stay on a particular instance if they don’t federate with something you want to engage with.

              That’s your freedom of choice.

              • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                7 months ago

                There is no plan for kbin to defederate with Threads, which is why I’m here you dolt. Maybe you should leave.

                • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Makes sense, Kbin is one of the most lax instances when it comes to moderation and defederation, and that’s why they’re considered so bad when it comes to spam and illegal content.

                  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I like the freedom of kbin but also maintain an account on Beehaw because they are the complete opposite with frustratingly strict moderation to the point of moderators telling people to check their naughty language at the door (which is totally understandable).

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Then get fucked?

              Meta are largely responsible for the current state of affairs right now. Nearly every current war, genocide, fake news, and more can be tied back to Meta.

              • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                7 months ago

                Are you seriously simplifying all current conflicts caused down to simply social media? So if we completely remove all social media, humanity instantly becomes the utopian society from science fiction. STFU with this stupidity you ignorant child.

                • Deceptichum@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Simply? No.

                  Dangerously and deliberately engageful? Yes.

                  Look at the impact of FB in the Rohingya genocide for fucks sake.

                  Fucking right wing wanker.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Then you’re evil. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              Go ahead, be evil. It is certainly your prerogative.

              Edit: just look at how many votes “But what if some of us don’t care if they’re evil?” got. Like, what a wild-ass bullshit thing to say. This thread is definitely being astroturfed.

              • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’ve noticed a lot of turfing on all of these threadsfed posts. It’s becoming more and more. People just need to get a threads account if it’s so important to them.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Well they’re clearly aware of us, we can’t pretend we’re just a bunch of silly little beans doing our own thing anymore. Of course they’re going to do this. There is literally not a single reason for them not to.

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                We should have rules against turfing like this in the community, and remove or ban people suspected of it. I get the benefits of having a neutral place but at the same time we don’t allow advertising here so why should suspected astroturfing be any different.

              • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s sarcasm. I upvoted them because I would have said something similar to highlight the absurdity of any argument against defederating with Threads.

              • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Thanks, it is my prerogative.

                This is the point of the freedom of federated communities: we can read whatever the fuck we want from wherever the fuck we want without having authoritarian censor-heavy limp-wrist adult-baby moderators and corporate fascists determining what we are allowed to read or affiliate with.

                The freedom to read both sides and control what I want to interact with on my own will, and make my own decisions is why I’m fucking here. I don’t want people like you making decisions for me, go fuck yourself.

                Thanks for noticing I’m evil. I’ll go make a nice blood sacrifice to my effigy of Satan by eating another baby.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Right, so nobody’s stopping you from joining threads, or making your own instance. You can call it evil.villain. Why don’t you?

                • Dieinahole@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  So when they steamroll this place so hard you only get their side of the story, what then?

                  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    I promise you nothing is going to get steamrolled, you are simply being very ignorant.

                    In fact, I will @ you with a reminder in 30 days as a reply to this message of how mundane and routine everything is to prove you are wrong.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m sure there will be instances that remain federated with them, and you can join those… or just join Threadstagram.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is what I’m thinking. I don’t understand why people fled from the corporate internet only to be excited to go back to them.

            • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Defederating with Threads is a great way to make people “go back to them”, so I’m not sure what your point is.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              7 months ago

              The corporate internet is adopting an open protocol. I find that to be exciting. It’s not us “going back” to the corporate internet, it’s the corporate internet coming to us.

              • dezmd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                All of the corporate internet adopted open protocols in the first place. Expand your limited view and increase your awareness of the history of the networks as they evolved before Google, Microsoft, and Apple were beginning and end of tech. We got to now with open protocols. Now everything is being walled up by DRM since theyve managed to preintegrate it in all of the hardware across the board before the open protocols even come into play.

        • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          When you fuck over people with their freedoms, you don’t deserve the freedom to be extended to you.

          It’s the same as paradox of tolerance. You shouldn’t be tolerant to intolerance, and you shouldn’t give freedom to those who want to strip it away from you.

          That’s like freedom 101.

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          decentralization purpose is choice to move to other instance

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          So… admins aren’t free to choose? Why are you trying to take away admins freedom of choice? Sounds kind of authoritarian to me.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If you’re self-hosting a personal instance, do whatever you want.

            But if you’re hosting a community for other people, you should consider what they want. That’s the responsibility of a community leader.

            • Zorque@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s the beauty of the fediverse, if the instance you’re on isn’t doing what you want, you can move to another one. Or create your own.

              I’d say that’s a pretty clear indicator of the popularity of decisions. Saying “No, you can’t do that, cause I don’t want that” is putting your desires above the desires of others.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can spin up your own server… That’s what the fediverse is.

          The freedom to do whatever you want as an admin, and the freedom of choosing another server where you’ll still be part of the network

          Meta/Facebook threatens this, because their user base dwarfs the rest of the fediverse. They’re also running their own closed source server code… They can gatekeep their own federation

          I would love it if companies joined the fediverse, but like, by making instances. Maybe even use it for their internal Intranet. Maybe they could add federation compatible APIs to their existing software

          I don’t want a massive social network company to use their position to make a new social network…

          Federation is like Bitcoin or Tor - it’s decentralized, until one org becomes too large… At that point, they can control the network in countless ways

    • Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ever play Plague Inc? The secret to winning is to not become deadly until you’ve already become engrained and established throughout society. Then you add the deadly features once you’re too deep in.

      Don’t let the cancer establish itself as something innocent. The owner of the platform WILL take any opportunity to seize control of the media so it can seize control of the message.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        “yes, they kill, torture, brutalize, pillage, and kick puppies, but if we don’t allow them an equal voice, can we truly say we are any better?”

        Yes. Yes we can.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m sure Meta won’t be awful this time! Sure they’ve been awful quite literally every single chance they’ve gotten, but they won’t be this time!

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        7 months ago

        Damn. Better block it now because we literally can never go back to reassess.

        Fuck I wish we had more time to decide!

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not saying they won’t. I’m saying there’s no reason to defederate preemptively.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          7 months ago

          I honestly don’t understand how some of you have this point of view. This isn’t a they’ve been evil once or twice thing. This is a they’ve been evil at every single opportunity and actively seek out more opportunities to be evil for well over a decade and you’re a fucking moron for trusting them thing.

        • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s the only way to do it with minimal damage.

          Defederating after this happens will cause a giant strain on the Fediverse and will simply accelerate the problems for which we don’t want Meta here in the first place.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Federation means you can defederate for any reason. It’s not a set of principles, it is an ontological arrangement whereby power is distributed. Plenty of users will look for defederated instances to join because keeping facebook out of our shit is what we want. You are free to find instances that are federated. Nobody will stop you.

      And as for things they’ve done, personally I find that knowingly stoking genocide in Myanmar is enough for me to not give them any more chances.

    • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d be closer to agreeing with you if XMPP didn’t completely invalidate your point. They did it there and they’ll do it here.

      • kpw@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        XMPP works great, you just have to use it. It doesn’t invalidate anything.

        • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Theres a reason nobody uses it anymore. Google extended the crap out of it, effectively took over the protocol and then retired it. It bears the same echoes of what’s happening here.

          • kpw@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            This didn’t happen. In fact Google was the one who fell behind development when the protocol moved on and deprecated unencrypted connections for example. People just don’t make it a priority to use XMPP instead of the walled gardens they are using now.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t like Meta. Why do you assume everyone has to be on one “team” or the other? I’m in favor of open protocols and open protocols can be used by anyone. Even if you don’t like them.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Every open protocol that survives past the first couple of days of actual use, no exceptions, has some mechanism whereby bad actors can be removed.

          Don’t use “open protocol” as your excuse for sucking Zuck the Fuck off.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            As I just said, I don’t like Meta. And keep your homophobic slurs out of civil discussion.

            But they are not yet a bad actor on the Fediverse because they haven’t actually joined the Fediverse yet. If you’re so convinced that they’re going to do something awful, why the big deal about defederating preemptively?

            • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              You don’t like Meta. You’re just arguing vociferously for inviting Meta, a company with nearly two decades of documented abuse of everything they touch, into another space for them to fuck over.

              Pull the other one, Sparky. It plays Jingle Bells.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                There’s no need to invite Meta, the invitation has already been given by the fact that ActivityPub is an open protocol. I’m just very annoyed by the cavalcade of people who were so quick to tout that benefit over Reddit’s walled garden now turning on their heel and reacting “but not like that!” When that openness is made use of.

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Embrace, extend, extinguish.

      You are either innocently unaware of how it works or just dissassociating from reality. Meta has to compete with Fediverse if it can’t directly harvest user activity for marketing and advertising systems. They quite obviously will (have to?) do everything they can to influence technical decisions that allow them to steer the protocols in a way that is profitable rather than for the good of the end users and communities.

      They ultimately will seek to build walls around their development and services on their terms and leave others not part of their profitable ecology of development outside of those walls. They are a publicly traded corporation, this is just a normal evolution in for-profit corps, even if current employees do act as positive curators of community engagement.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Defederation is part of the protocol.

      At least make your rhetoric somewhat resemble reality? Please?

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re confused and likely think that federation means no rules and unconditional access to any server from your account, when it couldn’t be further from the truth. I’ve said it elsewhere but people craving that don’t want the fediverse, they want Nostr.

        This place is the way it is, why it’s enjoyable to be on, because we can and do defederate servers run by bots, trolls, or any other malicious actors, otherwise they run wild.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, and I’ve got nothing against defederation. Once there’s actually a reason to defederate.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nearly 20 years of Facebook abuse is apparently not a reason.

          Holy fucking shit is the attention span of humanity getting short.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      The microbloggers are a bit different than us, in that they actually try to create a “social circle.” Threaded discussions with random assholes like we enjoy tend to be more focused on giving us someone to reply to.