• HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The main issue is that they communism is economic policy, NOT social policy. While they do go hand in hand people often conflate the two. Many dictatorships use communism as a way to control the people but that doesn’t mean that communism leads directly to dictatorships.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess the main issue is with the government having absolute control over the economy. I would not want the most prominent politicians in my country having control of the economy. No matter how much I dislike capitalism.
      Just put the people who work for a company in charge of the company. Have them elect who calls the shots. Also have them directly benefit from the company doing well. I guess that is like end-stage unions or smth. All power to the workers. Should be doable within capitalism, maybe, probably.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “All power to the workers” is a communist principle, though. It’s the main political slogan of the communist manifest by Marx and Engels.

        • tara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s about incentives. Worker oppression in Monarchy requires a bad King, in Feudalism bad lords, in Capitalism bad shareholders, and in Socialism self-hating workers. If you shared your workplace, would you push to remove your rights? Or to screw over your customers? And then argue for that against everyone else you share power with? The incentives are plainly better in a worker owned economy.