• BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Antinatalist here - the rhetoric in that post is horrible, and is not representative of antinatalism as a whole.

    Antinatalism isn’t the belief that a certain group shouldn’t reproduce - it’s that nobody should. The world is fucked, and nonconsensually bringing anyone into it is morally reprehensible. It’s not eugenics, it’s voluntary extinctionism.

    For the people that have been born, however, everyone deserves respect and equity. Ableism, or any other kind of discrimination, is just wrong, and makes you a shitty person. Just like the person who made that post.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is an incredibly dumb idea. It will also die out for incredibly obvious reasons because everyone else will keep reproducing while antinatalists descend into irrelevancy.

      Genesis 1:28 and al-Baqarah 2:187 instruct reproduction. Antinatalists are destined for the fire.

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wow, the Church of Shar exists in the real world.

      I think your belief system is a rare example actual Evil. You’re literally advocating for the elimination of music, of art, of science, of anyone who could even appreciate those things. No more Rembrandt or Dali or Mozart or … anything. And you’ve gotten so twisted up inside, ostensibly because some people live sad, hard lives, that you think that’s a good thing.

      Dude, find a therapist. This is no way to live.

      • norbert@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Brother if you think advocating for less population is “actual Evil” you’re in for a real hard time out in the world.

        • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          They’re not advocating for a lower population. They’re advocating for human extinction.

          As in, we should all let the torch of consciousness burn out. I don’t know if I’d call it evil, but it’s definitely one of those severely misguided takes that you almost exclusively see on the internet.

          • GreenMario@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s bound to happen.

            At current rate we will never leave this planet, and it will die. If not by climate change then the Sun will go Red Giant and swallow us. Or a meteor. Something. All species will go extinct sometime.

            You’re here afraid a few people believing that we should go extinct when there are 8 billion people and rising is gonna cause actual extinction. Fucking calm your tits, dude.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Arguing that people must exist so as to maintain art and science is rather silly. Art and science exist for our utility; we are under no obligation to them. If people decide not to reproduce, that is their right.

      • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m advocating for the elimination of poverty, disease, death, pollution, war, hate, and all human suffering.

        Sure, there are some neat things in this world that are worth experiencing if you were forced to live. If you’re already alive, of course you should seek to find happiness and enjoyment in the little time you have.

        Still doesn’t justify forcing more people into the world to exacerbate the problems we have - overpopulation being a major one.

        It’s not evil. Things were fine before us, and things will be fine after us.

        • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Things” were not observable by anything with the capability to designate them as such, so no they were not “fine” in any meaningful sense of the word.

          You’re literally doing the speech the villain does to make him seem reasonable.

          I am literally begging you to find a therapist.

          • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Semantics, but if you really want to get into it, a lack of ability for things to be good or bad is still better than the existence and perpetuation of suffering.

            Also, responding to differing worldviews with “see a therapist” and comparing them to a villain is fucking disgusting

      • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Isn’t it just the belief that nobody should have kids though? I’d have thought the while extinction part would rank higher than the culture loss. And evil seems a bit extreme, sounds more like apathy and loss of hope to me. Not saying there aren’t some messed up people in the group though.

        • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          sounds more like apathy and loss of hope to me.

          Yeah, this. My biggest issue with the fundamental anti-natalist position is that it’s a totally blackpilled one that ultimately devalues any positive experiences life brings when compared with even the potential for any bad thing to happen, regardless of magnitude.

    • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s not eugenics, it’s voluntary extinctionism.

      “Don’t worry guys, that person doesn’t represent us - what they should have said is that they wish for all of humanity to die out.”

      This is an absolutely insane thing to advocate for. I hope you come to realize that in time.

      • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’m not saying we should kill people, I’m saying making more is wrong.

        It is a nonconsensual act whereupon you are forcing life and all its travesty onto another being, when they were perfectly fine not existing.

        Call me insane if you want, I couldn’t care less. Humans are a plague upon both other humans and this planet as a whole, and bringing someone else into the world to be both a victim and perpetrator of the issue is wrong.

        • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Why stop at humans? Ducks are pretty reprehensible as well.

          And the less said about koalas, the better.

          • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Humans are the primary cause for global suffering. Ducks are pretty fucked tho, they could probably go as well.

            Mosquitoes I shouldn’t even have to mention. I think we can all agree those fuckers need to go

        • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think your perspective about life is blinded by pessimism, and you’re treating that pessimism as absolute fact. Many people view life as a wonderful thing, are thrilled to exist for the time that they do, and see creating a new life to experience the wonders of living as a gift.

          Humans are a plague upon both other humans and this planet as a whole

          You’re sounding like Agent Smith from the matrix. Come on. Unplug from the negative feedback loop for a bit.

          • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You call it pessimism, I call it realism.

            There are good things to experience, yes. If you’re already alive, then by all means, seek to find happiness and enjoyment. Don’t force someone else into that endless struggle. You can make no guarantees that their life won’t be one of pure suffering, and that’s not a risk I’m willing to take.

            And again, we are destroying this planet - not just for us, but for all life on it. We are the problem.

            • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              You call it pessimism, I call it realism.

              Says every person with depression ever.

              I agree with the other commenter recommending therapy. When you don’t see it as “life is pain and the future is hopeless”, you might sound less like a scifi villain calling for human extinction.

              • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                “Existence is suffering” is a foundational tenet for many worldviews and religions, not just antinatalism. Existence is literally the first cause to all suffering - no existence, no suffering.

                Acknowledging that doesn’t make me depressed or pessimistic, it’s just acceptance how things are.

                You’re free to live in whatever fantasy you want, though. That’s your right.

                Also, responding to differing worldviews with “get help” is generally bad form

                • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Your worldview is literally calling for the extinction of all humans. You need to come back to reality and stop convincing yourself that this is normal or healthy.

                  • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Yes, it is. And I’m just fine, I prefer not to live in idealistic delusion

                    Maybe educate yourself on the actual philosophy

        • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Dude if people really have such a problem with life, they can in fact opt out of it at pretty much any point down the line.

          • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            If someone experiences so much suffering that they are pushed to “opt out of it”, it would have been better not to force them to live and experience the suffering in the first place. Just because someone can take themselves out of it doesn’t make the suffering okay to inflict.

          • GreenMario@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            So if your kid doesn’t want to fight in the water wars you’re just gonna say “lol kys nerd”? Tragic.

            • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Firstly, I don’t have a kid. Being sterile (and also just not wanting any), I am quite unlikely to ever have a kid. Ideally we as a society would work to avoid water wars happening. My point is that we should improve our collective state of affairs somewhat, rather than resigning ourselves to the idea that to exist is to suffer like a bunch of loser doomers.

              • GreenMario@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                There’s no fixing to this shit and deep down you know this.

                I saw how humanity got together to deal with COVID. Spoiler: they fucking didn’t.

                What a garbage species we are.