weird@sub.wetshaving.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 days agoEvery timesub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1753arrow-down17
arrow-up1746arrow-down1imageEvery timesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareSneezycat@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up66·7 days ago“Accidentally” of course, I absolutely would never cat /dev/random on purpose just to see what happens…
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·7 days agoYou should really be using /dev/urandom though.
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkarrow-up15·7 days agoBut /dev/random is more surprising and not because it’s more random.
minus-squareNat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 days agoAren’t they the same now?
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 days agoI prefer aplay /dev/random, myself
“Accidentally” of course, I absolutely would never
cat /dev/random
on purpose just to see what happens…You should really be using /dev/urandom though.
But /dev/random is more surprising and not because it’s more random.
Aren’t they the same now?
Isn’t there
arandom
too?I prefer aplay /dev/random, myself
Of course