An argument can be made that all actions people take are for their own self-interest. Even things like helping the community is done for reciprocal benefits for yourself plus the general increase in respect.

Another point is that if all people just act for their own self-interest, they will have a better life themselves, and if everyone does the same, some sort of proper balance will be achieved.

I have been having some occasional discussions with my friends over this. I personally disagree, but would love to hear what others have to say. Feel free to discuss!

  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    and if everyone does the same, some sort of proper balance will be achieved.

    What makes you think that logically follows? Why would it not create competing self-interests that can’t coexist?

    Even if you broaden it to acting for indirect reciprocal benefit plenty of people act in ways that don’t have a reciprocal benefit. Just look at the Madleen flotilla, everyone there is putting themselves at personal risk for no personal tangible benefit - the position of self interest would be to stay safely away from the war at home. Look at all the local charities that help vulnerable members of their communities for no personal benefit. Look at people acting against their self interest just within their own families, like supporting elderly parents despite the costs and even though their death would speed their inheritance. There is a huge range of actions that fall outside of both direct and indirect self interest that people take every day.

    • Ithorian [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I think that you might be ignoring “spiritual” self interest. It deeply upsets and enrages me (and every other reasonable person) to see people brutalized like in Gaza. My mental health would literally be better if such atrocities weren’t happening.

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It deeply upsets and enrages me

        But why? It doesn’t affect you. It isn’t in your self interest to be upset by those things, it just makes you feel bad. Wouldn’t it be more reasonable to say that you are simply able to feel and act selflessly rather than invent a form of self interest that involves caring about other people?

        • Ithorian [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          I think i get what you’re saying but isn’t empathy a basic human emotion. Obviously stronger in some people then others but it’s not something that can be just switched off. I suppose i could willfully ignor what’s going on. Which in someways i guess i am doing…

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Absolutely it is, and it even seems to be hard coded in many non communal species, like the wombats that open their burrows to other animals during Australian wildfires, but empathy isn’t powered by the idea of reciprocation. It’s an inherently selfless feeling that doesn’t consider either direct or indirect benefits for the self, and it doesn’t make sense to say that acting on those selfless feelings, against your self interest, is itself selfish.