I want to be part of the solution of the problems I see on Lemmy, that is why I opened my alt account at my current server to open new communities while fixing their issues.

I had been informed by the server admin that I should not post more than 5 posts in any local community which is guaranteed to kill my communities on my current server.

I am explaining the backstory here for people to understand my logic for my question.

So, I really appreciate any help here. If anyone can give me good servers to open my communities in.

My current communities:

  • News: to lower the load on Lemmy. World server and to improve the Fediverse health.
  • Europe: due to less than optimal moderation actions as documented in "power trippin " community.
  • Misinformation/ Disinformation: Because there is no community to post research and news about this topic.

Thank you all for your help. I really would appreciate any lead here.

  • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It sounds like you are looking for a server that is ripe for bot abuse. What time frame did the admin say not more than 5 posts. I would tend to think they mean 5 posts a day which sounds completely reasonable to be for an upper limit on posts per day into a single sub.

    • Pro@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, The time frame is per day.

      Here is the reason I don’t support that limit:

      From my experience in moderating the technology community at my main account, no one will post on my new community for very very long time.

      How will news community for example survive on 5 news posts daily? As I said it will be granted to fail if it did not contain useful news posts that cover wide amount of topics.

      • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t need 5 posts a day for a community to survive here. There’s not that many people on Lemmy, things are a bit slower paced.

        I mod !bicycles@lemmy.ca and we’d be lucky to have one post per day, yet I think it’s still a relatively healthy community, with a decent amount of engagement on most posts.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          You don’t need 5 posts a day for a community to survive here

          “Surving” != “Thriving”.

          A couple of years ago, I noticed that the front page of HackerNews was consistently getting links from Mastodon posts. That was interesting because it showed that at least one significant part of the tech conversation had moved away from Twitter and into the Fediverse.

          No such thing has happened for Lemmy. There is no particular community which is thriving. There is no example of subreddit community that had successfully boycotted Reddit and transplanted here. We have the usual handful of posters, each one trying to maintain their communities “alive”, but that is far from its true potential.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Oh, wow. Thank you for a very good example for self-selection bias!

              Seriously, though: why is it that you feel this intense urge to dismiss any and everything I am saying? Don’t you think that is a little bit sad that all you can do is this mindless pontification?

              • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                21 hours ago

                I reply when I see absolutes such as “all communities on Lemmy are dead”, "all mods are bad ", “all communities are about politics”

                It paints the platform in a bad light and it’s not accurate.

                Don’t you think that is a little bit sad that all you can do is this mindless pontification?

                Another example of absolute.

                I help this platform grow by regularly posting and engaging with regular users.

                Stop using absolute statements and I’ll stop replying.

                • rglullis@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  I reply when I see absolutes such as “all communities on Lemmy are dead”, "all mods are bad ", “all communities are about politics”

                  1. I didn’t make any of these statements
                  2. There is a big difference between “sweeping generalizations” and “categorically correct statements”. The former are the statements you give as examples, but the latter can apply to the absolute majority of cases, even if someone has a data point (“the exception that proves the rule”) in the contrary.

                  It paints the platform in a bad light

                  Why would you think that?

                  The original argument was “Communities don’t need a lot of posting to survive here”, and my response is basically saying “we should strive for more than surviving”.

                  It seems like that instead of focusing on the part where I am calling for more action, you decided to focus on what you perceive as criticism and you try to attack that as soon as possible.

                  Stop using absolute statements and I’ll stop replying

                  It feels like your problem is not with the “absolute statements”, but that you are doing your best to reject reality.

                  It doesn’t matter if the number is 100% or 99% or 92.376%, what matters is that it has been two years since the Reddit boycott and we still do not have a good example of a thriving community here. We had many attempts (the /r/selfhosted people, the /r/blind), but they are by and large still on Reddit. Can you at least agree to that?

                  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    There is no particular community which is thriving.

                    https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active_month

                    47 communities with more than 5k monthly active users.

                    It seems like that instead of focusing on the part where I am calling for more action, you decided to focus on what you perceive as criticism and you try to attack that as soon as possible.

                    I didn’t see a “call for more action” in that comment.

                    !fedigrow@lemmy.zip and !fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com are communities about acting to make the platform grow.

                    they are by and large still on Reddit. Can you at least agree to that?

                    Of course they are, the same way the vast majority of microblog users are still on Twitter compared to Mastodon. That doesn’t prevent communities to thrive, as stated above.

      • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t dislike the Adam’s Family nor the Munsters, but I have blocked both communities because they each had a ton of submissions on the same day, and they were dominating my feed.

        There’s nothing wrong with slowly submitting content. Submitting too much, too quickly makes it hard to distinguish from spam.

        Just my opinion. I understand that you are looking to build something, and therefore you disagree on submission frequency.

        • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t dislike the Adam’s Family nor the Munsters, but I have blocked both communities because they each had a ton of submissions on the same day, and they were dominating my feed.

          I love eevee and its eeveeloutions, but the eevee community is spammy AF. I unsubscribed after a couple days. I am getting close to blocking it altogether.

          I mod the women’s hockey community on OP’s instance, and post the results of all games (this past season there were only 6 teams so not a lot), but if there are two games in a day I try and put at least 6 hours between the posts so not to spam.

          • Skavau@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I suppose it depends on the purpose of the community. Narrowly defined communities like eeveelutions or The Addams Family don’t really justify a glut of content in an hour.

            OP seems to run a news community though, which is probably where they ran into a brick wall with the 5 post limit. There’s a lot of news. And I guess you’re not a very useful news community if you miss a lot of it.

            • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Yes. And looking at the feed, there are 11 posts all at the same hour mark, then it will go a day or so with nothing then another dozen posts at once.