Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agoIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1464arrow-down138
arrow-up1426arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-21 day agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareshplane@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·24 hours agoLet’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
minus-squarebreecher@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 hours agoThey subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
minus-squareArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·23 hours agoAccident isn’t a harsh enough word.
Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.