not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-212 hours ago! Mastodon new ToS from July 1 has a binding Arbitration waiver* !!rlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1353arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1338arrow-down1image! Mastodon new ToS from July 1 has a binding Arbitration waiver* !!rlemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-212 hours agomessage-square55fedilinkfile-text
post: https://polymaths.social/@rl_dane/statuses/01JY2NBJEASW1E21NFJ0NZ3GDC github discussion: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/35086
minus-squareMicrow@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·14 hours agoThere is no legal precedent, but most likely you would only have to prove deletion on your own server.
minus-squareOlap@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoI think asking other instances to remove too is reasonable also
minus-squareMicrow@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 hours agoWe are talking legal obligations. If you remove content you posted somewhere in the fediverse, your server will send “delete” activities to other servers anyways. But your server does not know whether those other servers actually do delete it.
There is no legal precedent, but most likely you would only have to prove deletion on your own server.
I think asking other instances to remove too is reasonable also
We are talking legal obligations.
If you remove content you posted somewhere in the fediverse, your server will send “delete” activities to other servers anyways. But your server does not know whether those other servers actually do delete it.