• abbotsbury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    long winded way to say your objections are logical and sound while everyone else is just having a panic, you little moralizer you.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, no, it’s a concise way to say some objections are logical and sound and some are stemming from a moral panic.

      Whether I agree with the objections on each camp is, again, irrelevant.

      I disagree with some of the non-moral panic objections, too, and I’m happy to have that conversation.

      Four possible types of objections in this scenario, if you want to be “logical” about it:

      • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I agree with.
      • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I disagree with.
      • Objections that are moral panic that I disagree with.
      • Objections that are moral panic that I agree with.

      I think there aren’t any in that last group, but there are certainly at least some objections in all other three.