• Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    The amount of people that take these moral high roads is fucking ridiculous.

    Well, the faceless mega-corp made it difficult to purchase or stream

    I don’t like that I have to play the game on Steam

    Akshually I’m just copying it, so it’s not theft

    There are too many streaming services, so I shouldn’t have to pay for ANOTHER service

    I’m not depriving the content creator or publisher from any money, since I wasn’t going to pay for it regardless

    Just fucking own up to it. You are downloading content that you did not pay for. I don’t take some enlightened stance when I download a movie; I just do it. What I’m doing is not right, but I still do what I do. I don’t try to justify it with some bullshit political take.

    We all have our line on what we deem acceptable or not. The only piracy that, in my opinion, could have a leg to stand on is when it is actual lost media. No physical copies available, no way to stream or pay for it. Anything else is just the lies we tell ourselves to justify our actions.

    Just admit that you could pay for the content if you wanted to, you just choose not to, because you are a pirate. You are depriving someone somewhere from a sale or some other form of revenue.

    Edit: I worded “Just own it” poorly. Clarified it to “Just own up to it”. That was the original intent, just an oversight on my part.

    • Ronno@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Agree!

      If you want to pirate content, go ahead pirate it. But don’t act like you’re doing something morally right or some other mental gymnastics to tell yourself you’re allowed to pirate content. The truth is, you’re doing something illegal. If you’re okay with that, then by all means go ahead, but don’t tell yourself or others that it is somehow not illegal, because it is.

    • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think pirating scientific papers is a good thing all around. The research isnt funded by the selling of access to those papers, much on the contrary.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They’re are a million wrong ways to come at the wrong conclusion. So why then would we be surprised when many of the people who come to the right conclusion still do it for a variety of reasons? Perhaps the initial premise of why copyright should exist is conceptually riddled with holes.

      Owning an idea is inherently capitalist, but the average person who encounters a problem won’t spontaneously become anti-capitalist. They just know something seems wrong about this, but don’t understand why. So they make up a story to address their cognitive dissonance, like nihilism.

    • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Might I suggest the problem is capitalism. Without the everpresent threat of homelessness and starvation forced on us by the landlords, rampant price gouging of necessary goods like food, and the anti-lottery we all play every single fucking day with our own health, artists wouldn’t need nearly so much compensation for their work. Piracy wouldn’t matter, or even be required as a concept. I dream of living in a world without capitalism, but we don’t. Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I too dream of living in a post-capitalist world. But I’d bet dollars to donuts that people will pirate things regardless of the cost. They don’t want to pay anything for content.

    • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Why is no one mentioning here that the business model shouldn’t exist? If a copy can be made basically for free, there is no reason not to make it basically free. We should be providing everyone with the means to live regardless of their ability to sell stuff. If everyone was free to do whatever they please because their existence was provided for, people would still make media, because people love making things like that.

      Of course that might mean that in the short term, while we don’t do this, pirating might mean that some things stop existing. I’d be completely fine if all Hollywood movies and other shit disappeared overnight. Maybe then people would finally come to the understanding that our current model of doing things sucks.

        • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Capitalism is at the heart of your question. Art should be valued. Artists should be paid. Neither of those things requires capitalism or copyright laws. If as a society we funded artists properly none of this would an issue. The line that copyright is good for artists is total bullshit. It’s a smokescreen that corporations use to prop up the system they created and benefit the most from.

          • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Capitalism is definitely a major issue. I just don’t see how someone should not be compensated for work they perform, this includes art. Art can be free, but it shouldn’t have to be free. I think we may be saying similar things here.

        • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Eventually, yes. If everyone’s needs are provided for, there is no requirement anymore to extract value from art, one can just make it and share it freely.

          Copyright should be abolished.

        • iSeth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Especially if the creator(s) is deceased.

          Are you suggesting only the wealthy are deserving of art?

          • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Only the wealthy can afford art? Music? Movies? Graphic Novels? Video Games?

            Are you being obtuse?

      • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        the buisness model is essentially croud funding the movie after the movie is produced. Hollywood doesn’t need the money, but triangle staff does.

    • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just admit that you could pay for the content if you wanted to, you just choose not to, because you are a pirate. You are depriving someone somewhere from a sale or some other form of revenue.

      I usually can’t, actually. Not immediately anyway. But that doesn’t stop me from paying for it when I can. Done it with plenty of games. And if I didn’t have that option, which I primarily use for games I’m not entirely sure I’ll stick with, well… I just wouldn’t buy it. Full stop. Wouldn’t be a consideration at all. There is no lost sale here, only the potential to fall in love with it enough to buy it when I eventually can.

      Not saying this is some moral high ground. It’s not. But plenty of folks just can’t afford to gamble on whether or not they like something and end up paying it forward when they can.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      When I return from the library instead of the bookstore it is with the deepest shame.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is a specious analogy. e-books from libraries are already heavily controlled and are usually quite expensive to provide. Physical copies have their own inbuilt limits to distribution.

        You’re treating copyright like it’s some sort of hardline moral stance against consuming any media you haven’t directly paid for, when actually it’s more like a very long list of compromises to balance the conflicting requirements of creators’ needs to be compensated for their work versus society’s need to benefit from that work. This is why lending libraries, fair use etc are legal and piracy isn’t.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, I’m providing a counter-example and rejecting the argument that only lost media entitles you to consume media for free.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            And I’m saying that it’s a strawman, because that’s not the principle copyright law operated on in the first place.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, OP’s take is like that of petulant child arguing semantics as though it changed a thing. Doubly cringe for adding that second section at the bottom where he depicts his opponent giving up and agreeing with him.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      How’s the weather up there on that extremely high horse?

      Just because you personally steal stuff you can afford to pay for doesn’t mean that is what everyone else does. It’s good that you own up to that, but don’t project your failings onto others. If it’s against your morals to ‘pirate’, quit doing it.

      If you are unwilling to listen to or comprehend others peoples reasons, that’s fine- just don’t act like that makes us the same as you, because it doesn’t.

      I am not a Christian so I’m not beholden to their rules. Someone like you could claim I am a sinner and I should just own it. No, I don’t have the same beliefs that you do so I am under no obligation to behave how you think I should.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Ok there buddy. There is no ‘high horse’ here. Piracy is piracy. People need to quit with their bullshit justifications. Just own up to it. I do. The fuck are you on about Christianity? There is literally no connection to religion/beliefs here.

        People can’t afford to pay for it? Cool. It’s still piracy. One is still depriving the creator/studio/publisher/whatever of a sale.

        But I can’t afford it! Therefore I deserve to have it for free!

        Ridiculous.

        • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Folks sail the high seas for lots of reasons. Some people can’t afford entertainment otherwise. Some people like the challenge. Some do it for political reasons as an act of resistance against corporate greed. Some do it because they want to and nothing more. Don’t make the mistake of assuming everyone else here has the same motives as you.

        • Wolf@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          There is no ‘high horse’ here.

          🤣 Says the person actively judging others for their perceived moral failings, from their high horse.

          People need to quit with their bullshit justifications.

          You may not agree with it or understand it, and that’s fine. I’m saying don’t act like we all think that it’s wrong like you do and are going against our own belief systems. You are the one doing that, not me.

          The fuck are you on about Christianity? There is literally no connection to religion/beliefs here.

          Oh but there absolutely is, and you put literally zero effort into putting any thought into whether it did or not, your knee jerked and you went right back to defaulting your YOUR belief system and insisting everyone else follow it. Sounds exactly like some groups I could think of, I’ll let you puzzle that one out for yourself.

          People can’t afford to pay for it? Cool. It’s still piracy.

          You cant’ afford to eat? Cool, it’s still stealing when you nick a loaf or bread.

          One is still depriving the creator/studio/publisher/whatever of a sale.

          OH NO! You mean to tell me that I’ve deprived a billionaire of a couple of pennies?! I deserve to rot in hell.

          Ridiculous

          I agree. It’s ridiculous that you are only able to look at it from one very specific, capitalist boot licking pov and not even consider other peoples point of view. Must feel good to be so righteous and holy.