• FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That ignores just how slow it is. It’s on the order of 100x slower than “fast” languages like Rust and Go, so doubling in speed… while nice for Python Devs doesn’t really make it fast on an absolute scale. They need to double it’s speed a few more times at least.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        go is also not a fast language. it’s about halfway between python and c.

        but they all solve different problems so that’s ok.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Absolute rubbish. Go is typically something like 2-3x slower than “native” languages like C and Rust. Python is typically 50-100x times slower. Go is much much closed to C than it is to Python.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                17 hours ago

                i mean, that’s what you’re supposed to do. python is a glue language, after all.

                • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Nonsense. You are only “supposed” to do that because if you are using Python and you want performance you have no other choice!

                  Reminds me of people saying you aren’t “supposed” to store binaries in git - yeah only because git is so bad at it! When we were all using SVN people would have said “you aren’t supposed to have multiple people editing the same file simultaneously” as if it were a fundamental truth.

                  And Python isn’t “a glue language”. It’s often used like that but there are many many pure Python projects.

                  • lime!@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    but like, most of the standard library is written in c. most popular libraries are written in c. they’re built that way because python is a flexible way to glue functionality together. that’s the point of python: it’s easy. if i want performance, i port part of the logic to a compiled language. but most of the time that’s not necessary.

                    just like how with git, we have lfs. we build what we need when we need it. i don’t understand your tone here.

                • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Nonsense. You are only “supposed” to do that because if you are using Python and you want performance you have no other choice!

                  Reminds me of people saying you aren’t “supposed” to store binaries in git - yeah only because git is so bad at it! When we were all using SVN people would have said “you aren’t supposed to have multiple people editing the same file simultaneously” as if it were a fundamental truth.

                  And Python isn’t “a glue language”. It’s often used like that but there are many many pure Python projects.