If a machine is never 100% efficient transforming energy into work because part of the energy is converted into heat, does it mean an electric heater is 100% efficient? @showerthoughts@lemmy.world

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The sound will eventually dissipate in the air as heat. The light will be absorbed into surfaces, like any other radiation, as heat. Still 100%, but with a couple extra stops along the way.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      All energy output will eventually become heat. Why bother measuring efficiency at all if we’re counting those aftereffects?

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Only heaters are a machine where the “good” output is one you want to be heat.

        For other devices the heat is the bad part.

        But since your goal with a heater… is to generate heat… and all energy eventually will become heat, it is close to 100% efficient.

        If you can hear the heater’s sound it makes in a room/area you don’t want to be heating though, now it’s <100% efficient as a tiny bit of energy became heat that heated the non ideal location.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Fun fact: this phenomenon is what causes the infamous “hot ear” effect that many people suffer from every day.

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I mean you’d have to consider the practical factors such as how quickly or evenly they can heat up a room rather than worry so much about the raw efficiency.