• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why? Why would you want to be marketed to?

    And, they are only worth something to advertisers, if they work. Which in your case, they very likely wouldn’t. If the ads aren’t disruptive, they aren’t making money.

    People get used to ads, and so they stop working, as they stop working, they have to get more aggressive, but then people just get used to them again… It’s an endless arms race that will never stop for as long as internet services revolve around ads.

    • rockerface@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s all good points. I guess banner ads are just where I draw the line. And since that’s not feasible for either side, all that’s left is adblocking

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which isn’t feasible for either side, either. If the payment for services rendered is ads, and you simply don’t, then you didn’t pay.

        Stealing a single mars bar is a victimless crime, you may even have needed the calories to live, and the victim is a mega-corporation than can absorb the cost without ever noticing… But when you start approaching a point where every customer is doing it?

        That can’t continue.