• oatz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Every developer (~400) has a Copilot license of which about 50% are actively using it (we’ll start pruning licenses next month).

    My experience so far is that it’s biggest benefit is writing tests and refactoring code. The major downside is that it has a habit of introducing very subtle bugs that are easy to miss even with human review.

  • CodeMonkey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not at all in my org, as far as I know. We are a team of senior engineers somewhat set in our ways and I am not sure how good Copilot plugin for Emacs is.

    We are part of a large company and we had a mandate from up top to come up with ways to incorporate AI into our product. We prototyped a few, but could never get it batter than “almost good enough to be useful”. Other teams have presented promising prototypes of inhouse AI assistants that we can incorporate into products.

    My team pivoted to the inverse: seeing if we can make our product more useful to ML developers.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t know a single person who uses it, neither privately nor professionally. We don’t do much boilerplate and write a bunch of stuff that would take longer to describe in a prompt than write itself.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • deur@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Literally zero and a large chunk of the people you know have most likely actively used the software the company makes for more than an hour a day (pretty much regardless of country). If not, its replaced by software that serves the same goal from a different provider. The teams we work with are equally not using it.

    AI is not the future. It is not a tool worthy of use, and it is a major distraction from growing your skills. Especially if you are junior.

    • corytheboyd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It really does need to be stated that AI code completion is indeed NOT a learning tool. It’s an accelerated “copy/paste code from stack overflow” tool. Useful in its own right if you just want some rough code fast, but it’s not going to teach you anything. There is no easy way out of having to deeply understand code. It’s your job as a programmer.