• CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    LineageOS is very stable and usable as a daily driver, meanwhile PMOS struggles to deliver basic functionalities like calling and sending SMS.

    LineageOS has a bigger community and supports more mainstream devices, where PMOS primarily focus on PINE64 and Purism.

    • figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Wow that sounds like so much fun.

      /S

      For real, people should put disclaimers when recommending software like this. “I really like their vision, but installer beware! It is not ready for noobs! Also calling and texting just doesn’t work! Lol good luck!”

      • Kangy@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Maybe I’m just dumb (highly likely) but their state of PMOS page doesn’t actually say what state the project is in. It reads more like an about me

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, people should not judge things without testing them first. Pmos works well on supported devices. Its not for the end user at this point imo though.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you missed the detail that lineageOS and grapheneOS are based on AOSP and PMOS is based on mainline Linux.

    • hauiA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not really. Pmos works increasingly well and keeps you away from being dependent on vendor specific android updates because it is actual linux.

      You can check the devices page for compatibility. Most community supported phones can do phone things. Cameras are an issue though since they are highly complex and obviously proprietary crap.