• derf82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    One kid will contribute far more greenhouse gasses than a car will. One fewer child saves 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent per year, whereas going car free is only 2.4 tonnes. One less kid is better than 24 people ditching their car.

    And note I said step 1. Surely there are other actions, but not having kids is by far the largest impact.

    The big problem is everyone wants people to take the actions that they are ok with. Vegans think the best way to stop climate change is ending animal agriculture. Transit and bike advocates tell us it’s ending cars. Those same people will happily have multiple kids and fly around the globe without a second thought.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh I’ll agree there. Soon we’ll be 8 billion while we should have tried to level off at the 2-3 billion mark

    • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      you’re fighting a losing battle. ‘having kids is a good thing’ is the only piece of propaganda that is distributed to probably every human. and probably the oldest one, too. it’s also a base instinct, sort of hard to override by reasoning, as anyone who’s ever been horny or hungry can probably attest. this is probably the best example on here related to the posted question.

      for what it’s worth, I do think you are correct