• 1 Post
  • 169 Comments
Joined 29 days ago
cake
Cake day: May 3rd, 2025

help-circle





  • What I’m looking to do is point out that the world isn’t ever black-and-white, that the broadly applicable standards - while I agree that they are in fact broadly applicable - are never universal, and that edge-cases exist everywhere and need to be accounted for or the world is just a worse place for everyone. I’m not saying ‘your solution must handle solve for every case’, I’m saying ‘be aware that your solution needs to be flexible enough to account the fact that the real world is messy and things are never as simple as you’d like to believe.’

    I am specifically, as you say, advocating for the use of best judgement over moral absolutes (I have heard it said, in person and online, that anyone who doesn’t put a shopping cart back no matter the reason is a shit human being, f.ex, so there are definitely people out there slinging moral absolutes on the subject of shopping carts.)





  • Most of my youtube subs are educational/informative in some way or another, so I’m gonna break it up by category a bit…

    General

    • Half as Interesting
    • Wendover Productions
    • Answer in Progress

    Religion/Philosophy

    • Religion for Breakfast
    • Esoterica
    • Bart D. Ehrman
    • PhilosophyTube
    • Wisecrack (though it’s dead as of a month ago it still has tons of great content)
    • Michael Burns (the guy who did Wisecrack, now has his own channel, though it’s more politically-oriented)
    • UsefulCharts (not exclusively religious content, but largely)
    • SatansGuide (I keep hoping they’ll make more videos like their original 2, but it’s been a year…)

    General Science:

    • Veritasium
    • Dr Ben Miles
    • Kyle Hill
    • Stand Up Maths
    • Primer

    Science Experimentation:

    • Nile Red
    • Thought Emporium
    • Styropyro
    • Tech Ingredients
    • Alpha Phoenix
    • Applied Science
    • BPS.Space

    Programming/AI:

    • Sebastian Lague (his Coding Adventure series is super fun and informative)
    • Emergent Garden
    • Code Bullet

    Engineering:

    • Practical Engineering
    • Real Engineering
    • SuperfastMatt (guy builds crazy cars for fun, love his sense of humor)

    History:

    • History Matters (great short videos on historical topics)
    • Miniminuteman/Milo Rossi (mostly archaeology and such)

    Geography:

    • Daniel Steiner
    • Map Nerd
    • Jay Foreman (Map Men is hilarious, and the rest of his stuff is pretty good too)

  • Looks like it’s time to test the waters of Lemmy. This one has generally gone over poorly on reddit every time it’s come up, so let’s find out how it does here:

    What about people who have a high degree of difficulty getting around? A good friend of mine has a herniated disc and a bunch of neurological issues as a result of a car accident he was in, he walks with one of those rolling walkers at a very slow speed grunting and groaning the entire time, and that was at the best of times. He barely manages shopping by using those electric cart things, but with all the reaching and bending he has to do, by the time he got back out to the car he was sweating like crazy and in obvious pain, even with my help. The idea of expecting someone in that situation to endure another couple minutes of horrendous pain just to make someone else’s life very slightly more convenient by bringing his cart back up to the store even from the handicapped parking spaces strikes me as absurd, but he can’t always get help with his shopping so I know he has to sometimes.

    I think rules, written or otherwise, should have exceptions to account for extreme circumstances like this, but a lot of online people just go ‘No, if you don’t bring your cart back you’re a BAD PERSON no matter what!’.





  • What is with these vague, open-ended questions with no effort put in to try to provide any detail or literally anything to engage with?

    Now instead of answering your question I have to ask a bunch of questions myself:

    • How, exactly, are they wrong?
      • Are they merely incorrect?
      • Are they actively spreading disinformation?
    • Is their speech causing harm? If so what kind?
      • Is it direct and measurable like hate-speech or incitements to violence?
      • Or is it something vague and nebulous like ‘decadence’ or ‘societal harm’?
    • Who decided that they are wrong?
      • Experts?
      • Moderation teams?
      • Bureaucrats?
    • And most importantly, who is doing the censoring?
      • In what form?
      • With what authority?
      • In what medium?
      • For what purpose (actual, not stated)?

    Context matters, friend. Please provide some.




  • Libra00@lemmy.mltoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlwhat would you do?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s been a while since I was in the job market (I’ve been disabled almost 15 years), but the advice I consistently received was ‘call them’. If you apply online or file a resume or even drop one off in person, you’re just one name in a sea of applicants. File the resume, give it 3 days or so, then call them. Talk to the hiring manager if you can. Tell them who you are and what you’re looking for. Find out if they have a timetable on when they’re hiring. If they don’t give you one keep calling them every few days until they hire you or say ‘no thanks’. At that point you go from being one rando among dozens or more to being that one really persistent person who seemed super interested in the job and whose name is now memorable when they get around to looking at your resume.