• 1 Post
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle




  • I heard a hypothesis that the first human made consciousness will be an AI algorithm designed to monitor and coordinate other AI algorithms which makes a lot of sense to me.

    Our consciousness is just the monitoring system of all our bodies subsystems. It is most certainly an emergent phenomenon of the interaction and management of different functions competing or coordinating for resources within the body.

    To me it seems very likely that the first human made consciousness will not be designed to be conscious. It also seems likely that we won’t be aware of the first consciousnesses because we won’t be looking for it. Consciousness won’t be the goal of the development that makes it possible.





  • Personally I think the biggest hurdle will be moderation and defederation as it pertains to the first amendment. I believe there was already a supreme Court case where blocking a user on Twitter (from an official govt account) was deemed unconstitutional. This precedent might mean a govt instance is not allowed to defederate with any other server unless they defederate with all(?) This is pure speculation on my part, but I can guarantee it would go to the courts.


  • A great point! I feel like the overarching end goal is a meritocracy - people are rewarded for their talents and hard work. I’d wager most people agree with this goal.

    The problem becomes disentangling history and circumstance from our ability to measure talent and hard work. The only way we know to break some social norms that hinder a true meritocracy is to unfairly manipulate the playing field in the short term, which in itself does not follow a meritocracy.

    I think there are a few main obstacles:

    1. Perceived talent and hard work that was actually the result of circumstance - those that think the system is currently working and therefore their position is justified.
    2. Lack of acceptance that the goal is long term / generational. Those that are unwilling to accept a temporary ‘manipulated meritocracy’ in the short term that would allow a better one in the future.

  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlBlockchain: the wave of the future
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The perfect use case is tickets to live events. One entity creates one NFT for each seat or spot available and can initially sell them. The owner of that NFT (ticket) can then do whatever they want with it without the need for a third party (Ticketmaster) to scalp the shit out of any subsequent transactions.

    Proof of ownership of a single ticket at the time of the event is the end goal, which is what NFTs do.

    Why this hasn’t been done is pretty baffling to me.

    What’s better, is if artists want to provide a subset of tickets that are not resellable they can. Those tickets will only be accepted if a single transaction has taken place.



  • Ooo there’s a great video on Minute Food about vanilla extract vs synthetic vanilla. It basically comes down to: if you cook the vanilla, synthetic will taste the exact same, if you never heat up the vanilla it might be worth getting the real stuff.

    I assume the same is probably true of most oils, if you use EVOO for salad dressings it might be worth it, but if you’re using it to saute you might as well use sunflower oil and save some money.




  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlJust sayin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Love this write up! Thank you for posting, I really like your ideas. Out of curiosity how would apartment buildings work in your plan. There are many cities where you probably don’t want to encourage single family homes to reduce urban sprawl. How would you encourage high density housing in your plan?


  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlJust sayin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I understand your sentiment, but it took all of a half second to think of one scenario that would cause problems in the proposed system.

    As frustrating as it is to hold off on a good-intentioned change, it is far more detrimental to charge headlong without considering the consequences. The systems that are in place now are there for a reason. Some of those reasons are greed and corruption, but others are because of they fulfill people’s needs. It would be stupid to build a new system to address the greed side without addressing the need side.



  • I don’t have any other suggestions unfortunately. I have been using the general philosophy of this book with “ToDoist” which is a task/checklist app. Together they have made me feel more in control and my life less chaotic.

    It’s still hard to find motivation sometimes, even just followiny this framework. When I am following it, my stress levels seem to go way down because I’m not constantly worried I’ve forgotten about major things.

    Life’s hard man.


  • Yondoza@sh.itjust.workstoADHD memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comIts a vibe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    If anyone is actually interested in breaking this cycle, “Getting Things Done” is a great book that addresses this issue.

    In relation to this: identifying what needs to be done isn’t sufficient to start doing it. It is much easier to work on something when there are distinct tasks associated with it, so the next step after identify is create a list of all the tasks you need to complete along with all of the tools or resources you’ll need to complete that task. Then, when the time comes to actually do any of the tasks there are less mental barriers of ‘prepping’ and more just doing.

    This obviously won’t fix motivation problems, but it does help.