• hauiA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    It depends on what „quite there yet“ means for you.

    Performance wise linux gaming can be on par or better than windows. Statistically it should always be better by now because the resource hog that is called windows slows older systems down.

    The shader caches are bad, ngl. I have enabled downloading/precaching them in the background so its no big deal as long as you have steam open.

    So, for those used to windows and being picky enough to not accept any inconvenience for the tons of upsides: linux isnt for you yet.

    For those who are able to accept the tinyest inconveniences for a limited time: linux is a lot better than windows.

    • Unreliable@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Performance wise it was better for almost every game I played! I’m more used to Linux because that’s what I use at work, but I don’t have the greatest Internet connection, so that’s why the shader caches suck.

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thats very understandable. I hope it will get better at some point. I can’t even remember what the exact reason is. Probably because the engines run on directx and linux uses vulcan or something?

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What are the tons of upsides? Does my computer get 20% better performance in games? Do games never crash on Linux? I’m curious what these “tons of upsides” are. I game just fine on windows so I’m not sure what another OS can do to improve my gaming experience past what it already is.

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I dont know your computer. As I said, statistically its going to be better since the vast majority of computers are not racehorses and will benefit from less bloat. There are a ton of things you can do on linux that you either cant do at all or with significantly more effort on windows. You’re also not at the mercy of microsoft and whatever freeware runs on windows to make it fit your taste better because in linux you write or download a config to change things, no special programs needed.

        Games usually dont crash more often on linux than on windows these days, linux also keeps you from installing anti cheat rootkits as well (by being incompatible with it) which might be a downer if you’re really into an enshittified game.

        I can go on about this all day but in case your question was rhetoric and you just want to veil your undying love for windows, thats up to you.

        As always in life: If your concern is being right, you will always find arguments for it. If you want to learn stuff, there is plenty of opportunity.

          • hauiA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So it was rhetorical. Good to know. Blocked.

      • Néstor 🇵🇸@mastorol.es
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        @Woozythebear @haui_lemmy If you are happy with your windows gaming box and already on windows 11 or with modern hardware which is not going to get their performance crippled with win11 and you are not annoyed by the telemetry and the commercials inside your desktop nor by the fact that Microsoft is really pushing for using their online accounts in your local machine, then you don’t need to switch anywhere.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Statistically it should always be better by now because the resource hog that is called windows slows older systems down.

      That’s not how any of this works.