Transcription (of iMessage exchange): “Hi, is this Paul?

Who is this

This is Erica from the dentist’s office. I got your number from your file

Pretty sure this violates Hippo but shoot your shot I guess

I’m not flirting with you. We have you on video stealing thousands of dollars of x-ray equipment”

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m trying to figure out what X-ray equipment can be stolen that is worth only thousands of dollars. A case of those films you bite on when they x-ray your teeth?

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      154
      ·
      6 months ago

      And why, if you have photographic evidence of grand theft, you’d text the person who stole with just “this is Erica from the dentist office.”

      I have a feeling this internet person is making stuff up.

    • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      If something costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, it’s also accurate to say it costs “thousands of dollars.”

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I am just imagining him bored waiting for them to come back and he is like “fuck this, I am taking this shit, make this wait worth my while” and then just pulls out a tool belt and starts unbolting the thing from the wall.

      • rosymind@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nah, I’ve worked in dental. Those machines are insanely expensive. This is one hand-held unit for sale just under 3k, down from just under 7k . That doesn’t count the sensors, which are also crazy expensive.

        https://universadent.com/product/nomad-pro-2/

        Most offices have machines attached to the wall, which would be extremely difficult to steal. But a nomad is portable.

        https://dentimax.com/x-ray-sensor-comparison/

        Above is ONE sensor (most offices have at least 2) that costs around 7k. There are other neccessities as well, but I think you get the point

        • neonred@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, to be fair a few k is not expensive for medical equipment which is not a mass market, needs certification and usually lasts decades. It’s like no money.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s trump level defense - you can’t take me to court for stealing because that violates my Hippo rights

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s how it works actually - if you break the law while making the case, your case is invalid.

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thats why this needs to change.

        If you commited murder and someone breaks the law to get you, you should still get convicted.

        But the person breaking the law should have no immunity either and face the consequences of their actions. But if the person abused a position of power (police, politician, etc) they should face twice the punishment, one time for breaking the law and a second time for doing so in a trusted office.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s ridiculous. Detectives would have to sit there and do the math “is it worth me going to jail for 12 months to strengthen my case against X”?

          No. The Justice system literally stands for justice. People working for it should not be committing crimes in its name as if the ends justify the means.

          If the people working for the Justice system routinely commit crimes and are rewarded for it, you don’t have a justice system. This is literally why people are so mad at the police right now. The police constantly commit crimes and are not punished for it

          • hauiA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I agree. Justice also for those dealing it out, obviously.

            But my point wasnt „this and nothin else“ but „this is worth looking at“.

            Currently, if you have committed murder and the fact got known due to a search that wasnt done correctly, you‘re free. Not everything is black and white.

            We can agree that murder means jail and the people who might have done wrong finding it out get their own consequences (which they currently dont either).

        • mako@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The person you’re replying to isn’t correct. Police and prosecutors can’t break the law to make a case. If you exceed the speed limit while trailing a killer, they don’t get to go free.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s how you’ll end up in jail for no reason. If there’s no due process, anyone can Photoshop you in a crime scene for lulz. The law works as it should.

          • hauiA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah right. Thats why we have the situation we‘re in. Because the law works like it should.

            Look at statistics of poc incarceration rates or other minorities as well as false convictions.

            The law is always improvable as everything else is.

            But to my original point, falsifying evidence does not mean you can convict someone based on that. It just means the person does not automatically go free, just that the person who did it goes away for a long time.

            Please name examples if you think that there is a real benefit from letting someone go free for bad evidence except smart lawyers getting rich people off easily.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Some criminals tried to steal my mom’s flat through the court and a bit of corruption. That didn’t fly because she fought back, showed there was no due process and the national court put these fucks into jail, as well as punishing a corrupt judge.

              If there were no laws regulating the process, she’d be homeless. So, go fuck yourself.

              • hauiA
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                The first part was totally understandable and I am happy that your mom won that.

                Your fault is that you assume that not having a “the house search where we found you’ve killed 20 people was illegal so have a good life” dismissal of evidence means we have no due process at all. This is called improvement of a running system.

                And the last sentence is the reason I reported you. You sad person.

  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Why should an employee witnessing a crime contact the thief? And even tell their name and send their phone number?