A friend from Argentina once told me Argentina keeps its best wines for themselves and exports the mediocre stuff, even at the sake of profits.

Similarly, a friend from Turkey once said he couldn’t find good Turkish olives outside of Turkey because “Turks are terrible businessmen and keep the best olives to themselves.”

These are anecdotal and might be untrue but I liked the idea.

At an individual level, it’s irrational to cooperate in a prisoner’s dilemma yet experiments show people cooperate.

Contributing to open source projects may fall into this category.

Have you observed any obvious behavior that goes counter to profit maximization? Any cool examples?

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sure you could write an entire collection of books on the irrationality of Brexit.

    As James O’Brien graciously puts it: “We are the first country in history to have placed economic sanctions upon itself

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    This.

    It’s irrational to consider maximum monetary gain to be the only best outcome. Why? What’s the goal? Money is only means to an end, not intrinsically worth anything.

    Put another way, if the Argentinians cherish good wine, how are they better off with slightly more money and mediocre wine? (I guess they could use the profits to buy good wine?)

    • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally agree. That’s why I love it so much. Like a big “fuck you” to economic theory and profit maximization.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Gawd forbid people actually enjoy the things they produce rather than sell them abroad.for maximum profit.

  • SybilVane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Many governments cut social programs that would result in net benefits economically for society (e.g. disability services that mean more people can maintain jobs, education, family planning, public transit, all mean more money is being made overall including more taxes going to the government). But it isn’t a direct enough benefit and it’s hard to quantify, whereas slashing funding feels like immediate savings.

    Imagine no longer paying for your phone service in order to save money, then being confused about why none of the jobs you applied to are calling you back. Same logic.

    • OutDoeHoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well said. Using the US as a super obvious example, there’s been data for a long time that offering free publicly available birth control had a MASSIVE ROI. And yet we have piles of idiots out here saying “I don’t want my taxes going up for pay for some stranger’s birth control!”.

      We can even set aside considering a “decent human” aspect where we’re happy to save women and men from PILES of stress, strife, and burden. It just makes a fuckload of economic sense if you’re not dumb or some evil Handmaiden’s Tale-style piece of shit.

      • DerArzt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It just makes a fuckload of economic sense if you’re not dumb or some evil Handmaid’s Tale-style piece of shit

        Bro you can’t just call out 80 of elected government officials like that, you may hurt their feelings.

    • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you for the fun times. I don’t mod games, but other creative work I’ve done still feels real good.

      Other than self entitled twat end users shitting up a comment section. Very loud minority.

      • Renacles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        No problem!

        I’ve only done this for about half a year but nearly all the interactions I’ve had with the users have been great, I really can’t complain.

    • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I will never, ever respect someone who looks at the creativity and altruism of modding communities and says “That is irrational”. Absolutely soulless talk. No value in the world that isn’t monetary to those assholes.

      • Renacles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Absolutely, life isn’t about making money, modding is a hobby like any other.

        I think a lot of people think that anything that can make money should.

  • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Others in the thread have already hinted at this fact: logic and optimization are lasers that can be pointed at anything. Point it towards money and of course it’s irrational to forfeit profits for good wine. Point it towards the good wine and of course it’s irrational to forfeit evenings drinking good wine with friends.

    Put another way, one man’s trash is another man’s treasure.

    Of course, this doesn’t mean most people don’t share some common values. Most people want both wine and profits!

    Not only is logic and optimization a laser, but optimization can happen at many levels.

    There are many experiments where the most egg-laying hens are selected and bred, but often these hens are aggressive and kill each other. However, when whole groups of hens (e.g. a group of 5 hens) are chosen, some of the hens do not lay eggs but are peace-makers and create the perfect environment for egg-laying eggs to lay many eggs.

    In this example, optimization happened at the group-level and not at the individual level.

    Similarly, rich people who leave high-tax societies end up in a ‘Lamborghini in a road made of mud’ situation. However, if rich people contribute to the societies that made them rich in the first place, everyone benefits. There are lower anxiety, depression, and suicide rates for everyone (including the rich) in more egalitarian societies. Here you can see the laser and the levels: the laser is either pointed at the luxury car or the quality of life, while the level is either the individual or whole society.

    Group-level selection seems irrational for those who think that being an egotist is the only way.

    Of course, life is not just about lasers and levels. It’s about values. Rationality is a tool. It can help us live valued lives or trip us up. If you want good wine, good cheese, money to buy something else, good friends, and a good society, that’s what matters.

  • TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Germany does the same with wine to the point where Brits go to Germany and wonder why they’re sending us all the shit stuff

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The UK under Thatcher utterly anihilated its own manufacturing sector at a huge longterm economic detriment seemingly just to destroy labour unions.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      The UK manufacturing sector for raw materials and basic products was on the way out anyway due to costs being so low in Asia, so it was more to be able to shut it down and save the government from needing to bail it out while also destroying labour unions while they were at it, hence why the advanced manufacturers (JCB, Rolls Royce, etc.) were largely unaffected

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      While Italy does have very good cheese, I can’t help but to be reminded that they also consider maggot infested cheese to be excellent.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know if they still do it but when I was a kid in the 70’s they would dump semi trailer tanks of milk in the ditch to maintain pricing and supply.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      So typically stuff like that happens if supply outstrips demand, and selling the excess would drive prices so low as to cause the farmers to actually lose money overall. Dumping excess keeps prices balanced, so it at least makes sense from an economic standpoint.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can go to Starbucks and pay $5 for a coffee, or I can make better & get higher on at home for 25 cents.