• hauiA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whats EAC again? I’m always eager to learn what possible show stoppers exist for people.

      • Salivating_Toad@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I used to use EAC but recently switched to fre:ac because it works on Linux. Maybe there’s some features from EAC that are missing, but this could be an alternative if you’re interested in exploring it. I also rip and store on Jellyfin, and I’ve not noticed any problems w/ my FLACs.

      • hauiA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh interesting! What do you use for that and what is the result? Flac or other?

        • Zachariah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah, FLAC. EAC has numerous checks to make sure the rip was flawless. I then either listen from my computer on speakers attached to a stereo, or I stream via Plex/Jellyfin. I have wired and wireless headphones and earbuds I use depending on what I’m doing when listening.

          I already had lots of CDs before streaming was a thing, but still (more often than I’d expect) I come across albums that aren’t on any streaming platform.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      EasyAntiCheat. Not sure why it’d stop them, because Proton has an EAC runtime.

      • RommieDroid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Why don’t we have an open source anti-cheat protocol that is a demon-level service. Everyone hates kernel anti-cheat, but only because they’re close source, so why don’t we have one that’s open source. Seems like a simple solution.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I don’t think it can work if it’s open source probably. There’s always ways around anti-cheat. It’s only a matter of finding it. Making it open source makes it trivial.

          With that said, kernel level anti-cheat doesn’t really seem to slow anyone down much. I’ve heard that the games with them still have plenty of hackers. Why try to solve a problem with such a big weapon if it isn’t going to work anyway? Best case, it potentially adds some really deep vulnerabilities to your system, and maybe slightly slows down hackers.

          • whats_all_this_then@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            From my limited understanding, it seems like it’s dependent on the anti-cheat itself. Riot Vanguard is pretty much the gold standard and it does deter cheating significantly more than others I’ve seen. Like I think I’ve seen 2 or 3 cheaters total in 200ish hours of Valorant. Compare that with BattleEye or EAC (Siege and Apex respectively) and you see enough cheaters that it feels like they’re cheating every time you lose a fight. These are all kernel-level so it seems that kernel access is required but it also matters how good the actual anti-cheat is.

            Edit: It’s a bit weird with Apex thkugh because it could just as easily be the broken controller aim assist

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Valve will figure it out for us and then offer it for any game published on Steam.

          Dunno what state their own services are in currently for games like TF2, CS2 and Deadlock.