AI-ters.
  • MudMan@fedia.io
    23·
    18 hours ago

    That is correct.

    It is also correct that someone disagreeing with me can be doing so because of a moral panic. Our agreement is entirely disconnected to whether there is a moral panic at play or not.

    For the record, I think “AI” is profoundly problematic in multiple ways.

    This is also unrelated to whether there is a moral panic about it. Which there absolutely is.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      17 hours ago

      long winded way to say your objections are logical and sound while everyone else is just having a panic, you little moralizer you.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        24·
        17 hours ago

        Well, no, it’s a concise way to say some objections are logical and sound and some are stemming from a moral panic.

        Whether I agree with the objections on each camp is, again, irrelevant.

        I disagree with some of the non-moral panic objections, too, and I’m happy to have that conversation.

        Four possible types of objections in this scenario, if you want to be “logical” about it:

        • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I agree with.
        • Objections that aren’t moral panic that I disagree with.
        • Objections that are moral panic that I disagree with.
        • Objections that are moral panic that I agree with.

        I think there aren’t any in that last group, but there are certainly at least some objections in all other three.