• fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wasn’t this more about taking away the names from a bunch of people who in hindsight were terrible people? I remember something awhile back about people getting upset because some groups had decided that if you had a shred of negativity in your past, you weren’t allowed to discover and name things. I believe they were trying to change a bunch of names “to not honor the original person”.

    That didn’t feel like science so much as politics and I get why some would be against that.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Science is a highly political process.

      The real actual science, just ask petroleum, cigarettes, sugar, mosanto glyphosate, lysenkoism, grant allocation, DDT, lead gasoline and paint, amiante, IQ, operation paperclip, nuclear testing, SSRIs, opioid crisis, covid 19, gain-of-functionr research, psychology replication crisis, trans fats, usda food pyramid, even cold fusion and the latest entry in this list PFOA/PFAS.

      Scientific truths and regulatory actions often “become allowed” only when they are no longer economically threatening to the incumbents.

    • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Have you ever been to a niche scientific community conference? It’s always been 90% politics.

      The Magellanic Cloud community collectively decided that they didn’t want to study objects named after someone who had subjugated the communities of ancestors studying it, so they agreed to call them the Milky Clouds. A pop science article went out about it and people complained that it wasn’t science, it was politics. But unless you’re a part of that community, you don’t get to decide on the names of the objects that these people understand better than literally anyone else alive or dead. They’re doing more science regarding these objects than anyone else has ever tried, they get to decide what’s best, even if it appears political.

        • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I see it as the exact opposite. If we let the professionals, i.e. cartographers and historians hold the reigns rather than people who don’t have anything to do with it, eg. some pedophile politicians, nothing would have been changed.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Remember, it’s only “revisionist history” if it’s the history you don’t like. Otherwise it’s “because totally valid reasons”.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “unless you’re a part of the community fuck you”

        I can see why it got heated…

        • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well yes, generally that’s how jargon is developed. Typically people who don’t contribute to the knowledge base of a field don’t have any say in how that field uses language.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    19 hours ago

    From henceforth “trees” shall now be called “tall wavy bois” and “flowers” shall be known as “colorful stemmy bennies.”

    I will not be taking questions.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    NPC wojak: “I love science.”

    “Science says sex and gender are two different things.”

    NPC wojak gets angry: “Science was corrupted by the Jewish cabal! See: John Money*!”

    * John Money is not Jewish, but is pushed by transphobes with the hope you’ll accuse him being one.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This sort of thing happens all the time, and it’s usually subject to some level of debate. Just look at the ponderosa pine (pinus ponderosa. Some say there is one species with multiple subspecies, some say they are just different varieties, some say that they are different species, or some are and some arent, etc.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            NASA says there are only 5 dwarf planets in the system. But, it’s all pretty arbitrary. The line between planet, dwarf planet and asteroid are all pretty fuzzy.

            An alien civilization looking at the Sol system might say that it’s only got one planet, Jupiter. Everything else is so much smaller that they’re not really significant.

            Another logical cut-off would be that planets had to be bigger than any moons in the system. If we went by that standard, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Earth, Venus and Mars could all still count as planets, but Mercury would get ditched because it’s smaller than Ganymede and Titan.

            What’s funny is that we’re still using the name “planet” which comes from “asteres planētai”, meaning “wandering star”. For the Greeks what mattered wasn’t the size or the mass, it was how bright they were. That meant that a tiny object near the sun like Mercury (Hermes) got the name planet, because despite being tiny, the fact it’s close to the sun means it reflects a lot of light. And Jupiter (Zeus) and Saturn (Cronus) got named not because they’re so big, but because they’re big and far away from the sun, which means they reflect sunlight in a similar way to the much smaller inner planets. Earth’s moon might have been given the name “planet” if it had been a lot smaller and/or further away.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The most performative “hurr durr science” bullshit ever. Who fucking cares if Pluto was considered a planet when you were a kid?

      Not you specifically. There are people who really seem to care about this shit.

    • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The only reason Pluto is no longer a planet is because we discovered there were loads more planets and couldn’t be bothered to acknowledge their existence!

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s been like that for decades to be honest. Ceres used to be called a planet, but you don’t see anyone complaining about it’s demotion

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        20 hours ago

        i’ve spent 25 years on this blue marble fascinated by space, and only recently discovered there multiple long orbit dwarf planets going around the sun??? that is so cool why is this not widely known!

      • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        but so what?

        we used to have a handful of elements, but when we kept discovering more, we didn’t change the rules to have elements, and “strange elements” so schools only have to teach about 16 elements.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It’s all just made up categorization. It’s like that because astronomers have agreed to categorize them like that. That’s all.

        • Rose@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Well elements are elements. All of them are just protons and neutrons and electrons at the end of the day. They have different properties but all of them behave by the same rules.

          But there’s some big differences between the various kinds of bodies orbiting the Sun and how they’re orbiting the Sun. Big asteroids were considered planets, until we discovered there’s a shitload of them and they’re all in roughly the same area. When it turned out Pluto is basically in the same situation and there’s a lot more of the transneptunian objects, it was pretty clear that Pluto isn’t special. If you compare it to planets it’s pretty weird. But I think it’s good that they created the dwarf planet classification because that also elevated Ceres back, hell yeah.

          • IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I’d rather we have dozens of planets, with news articles talking about “new planets discovered”

            we can still teach the handful of “classical planets”, so we can have posters, or have like periodic tables, and everyone be aware that they might go out of date as more is discoverd.

            the solar system will be more exciting and more varied.

            also, the “clearing orbit from similar objects” is time and orbit dependent,

            larger orbits take longer to clear, which mean in a few billion years ceres might eject pluto and become a planet?

            or we could have gas giants beyond pluto (like this hypothetical 9th planet ) which it would be unlikely it has cleared its orbit, so we could have a planet larger than Jupiter which we would call a planet, but if we discover another planet in its orbit (too large to clear), then we will have to say that it is a dwarf planet.

  • LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Coleus amboinicus -> Plectranthus amboinicus and I’m back to having no coleus, I’ll never forgive

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cue in the guys about to get hanged meme. Paleontologist asking the Botanist, “First time?”