I see the human organism as a layering of different levels of consciousness. Each layer supports mostly automated processes that sustain the layers beneath it.

For example, we have cells that only know what it’s like to be a cell and to perform their cellular processes without any awareness of the more complex layers above them. Organs are much more complex than cells and they perform their duties without any awareness of anything above them either. And the complexity keeps increasing with various systems like endocrine, cardiovascular, etc. Then we have our subconscious and finally our conscious.

At our level, we do not consciously control any of the layers beneath us. Our primary task is to keep our bodies alive.

This got me thinking… isn’t it a little too self aggrandizing to think that we have a near infinite layering of consciousness beneath us and then it just stops at our level of awareness? What if there is some other conscious process that exists above us within our own bodies?

When people take psychedelic drugs they often describe achieving a higher level of awareness akin to ecstasy. Well what if this layer is always there actively ”living” within us but we are just the chumps that go to work, do our taxes, and exercise, while it doles out just enough feel good chemicals to keep us going (sometimes not even that)?

  • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Perhaps the next emergent entity is not corporeal, but, instead, of the collective. A good example could be similar to what @kozy138@lemm.ee stated about how the movements of people in crowds are, on the “microscopic” scale, seemingly random, and unpredictable, but, on the “macroscopic” scale, can be predicted quite accurately. One could look at economies, traffic flow, entire nations, etc. as emergent entities that rely on our individual, autonomous interaction. A very interesting such example is outlined in this paper which explains how “Online communities featuring ‘anti-X’ hate and extremism” can be accurately modeled using “novel generalization of nonlinear fluid physics”.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is an interesting idea for sure. However, we have some evidence to support the existence of the systems beneath our minds. What evidence supports the existence of a greater awareness within ourselves? Do we have anything beyond reports from people under the influence of drugs?

    I prefer to take an evidence-based approach, taking non-existence to be the null hypothesis here.

    • kozy138@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      One example would be when people move around in large crowds. Their behavior can be misspelled by following fluid dynamics equations. It’s as if thousands of people share a consciousness that they don’t understand/notice.

      Taoism teaches us that the it true consciousness is universal. We are essentially waves of energy, all bound together/connected by empty space. So we share a consciousness that can be tapped into his meditation and being in the moment.

      • Offlein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Good to know we can just “teach” any imaginary thing we want. It sounds like it’d be neat? Fuck it, let’s teach it.

        • Zippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Relax. It just some mildly funny idea to entertain that we are not all there is. Such as imagining the collective conscience of all humanity and animals makes up the real God. We just can’t perceive it being inside the experiment.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        A cell doesn’t have evidence of anything and is incapable of pondering such a thing. So the very idea of a cell having evidence is absurd.

        The idea of a person having evidence is not absurd. And I would argue that there is evidence that there is not a higher consciousness in our bodies. There is no bodily system that behaves in a conscious way other than the brain.

        • Zippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Except you can not prove that we are capable of pondering this higher level of consciousness just like a cell is unable to ponder anything as we understand it. For all we know, this higher level of consciousness also has a Reddit equivalence and has provided the same response as you in that they argue our own level of consciousness has no capacity to ponder anything. Or at least it’s definition of what it is to ‘ponder’.

          Maybe we are a single conscript in an infinite number of alternate universes that together with an infinite number of related and connected conscripts create some higher level of consciousness. Have you considered that?

    • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There are anecdotal stories of people entering higher states of consciousness during near death experiences, extremely deep meditation, holotropic breathing exercises, etc.

      Really creative people describe their most proud acts of creation as if the idea came from somewhere else. As if the concept arose independently and they tried their best to relay it into the real world.

      As for the people on psychedelic drugs, they usually speak of the higher state of consciousness as being more real than the real world… which would make sense if our usual consciousness was a subset of something bigger.

  • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    A group of brain cells begins to have emergent properties such as consciousness and intelligence. A group of human brains has similar emergent properties. An individual human mind wants this and that, but an entire human community will have completely different priorities.

    I prefer to think of the human population on Earth as a single massive organism that spreads like the mycelia of a fungus. Individual cells have simple needs and goals, but the organism as a whole will do much more than just expand everywhere and extract nutrients.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think you aree using the word “consciousness” without having actually defined it, thus leading to an observation that sounds remarkable but might not be at all.

    To be precise, I have no idea what you mean by lower levels of consciousness. Certainly there are systems that build upon each other, but where do you think consciousness resides other than where people ordinarily think it resides? And I mean this seriously. There might be some discussion about dreaming and subconsciousness, but at most that’s giving us three different types or levels of consciousness. What you wrote clearly describes more levels, and I just don’t know what they could be or where you think they are.

    • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I have a panpsychist definition of consciousness.

      I do not equate consciousness with “intelligence” or life for that matter. I think consciousness is a fundamental property of every little thing in our universe. I believe that higher levels of consciousness arise due to higher levels of systemic complexity.

      This definition is more intuitive to me as compared to the modern definition where conscious life develops on earth from essentially nothing that is itself “alive”.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    You do make a good point, and what you suppose is entirely possible, but personally I don’t agree with this interpretation:

    …isn’t it a little too self aggrandizing to think that we have a near infinite layering of consciousness beneath us and then it just stops at our level of awareness?

    Nah. I think the perspective that our awareness is the “top” is what lets us make the best of ourselves. If everyone’s attitude was “well, I’m no better than a pancreas, so fuck it” we’d all be lazy and depressed.

    Still, though, I think it’s an interesting observation.

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      But “fuck it” does not by definition follow, even if we’re pancreases. You might, for example, take pride in being a really good pancreas. And pancreases arguably have more structured purpose than most people feel–they are very definably serving a greater whole, whereas it’s not always clear how we are doing so, short of intentional effort.

        • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please bear in mind that I was in a pretty negative headspace when I wrote this post yesterday! On most days, I’d wager that it is in the best interest of each higher entity to nurture and support the lower entities because they need each other to exist.

          In other words I wouldn’t be able to enjoy life if my heart was in constant pain or simply gave out. Likewise, the heart would have more trouble doing its thing if I chose to never exercise, only eat fried foods, etc.

          I’d like to think that each layer “desires” an equilibrium and harmony.

          • magnetosphere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hey, I was in a pretty negative headspace when I read it!

            The closest comparison I can think of is being part of a job I liked. I wasn’t the boss, or part of the management team. I was at the bottom, but I knew I was good at my job and reliable. I liked the people I worked with. Not even a remotely glamorous job, but doing it well made me feel good. It didn’t matter, but it mattered, ya know?

            • aCosmicWave@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I do know! As my favorite job in the world thus far has been delivering Chinese food ☺️.

              I hope that you’re feeling better today! Apologies if my post sent you further down into negativity yesterday.