• Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    So, once again…Trump just rolled over and let Putin tickle his belly. Why would anyone be surprised by this?

      • Archangel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        The guy brags about how he has this magical influence over Putin, and “if he were in charge, none of this would be happening”…but when presented with an opportunity to prove that influence, Putin just says, “Nah, fuck that”, leaving Trump with no choice but to shrug and say, “Oh, well…I tried”.

        If you don’t find this pathetically hilarious, then you need to check your pulse.

        • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          It’s funny that Trump believes he has leverage over Putin, yes.

          Your comment implied that Putin had leverage over Trump, which is equally false and hilarious. Sadly, the Western media has pushed that narrative to garner the most martial diplomatic stance possible in this Second Cold War.

          • Archangel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            My comment only implied that Putin holds the dominant role in their relationship. For all his tough talk, Trump goes as soft and submissive as a toothless puppy whenever Vlad enters the chat. Then he spends days gushing about how wonderful it was just to talk to him, regardless of the actual outcome. It’s like watching a 12 year old girl with a crush.

              • Archangel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                I don’t think the Ukrainians would agree with your assertion that their desire for independence is based on a “liberal obsession with the personalities involved”. I know for a fact that if it was my country being invaded by a hostile neighbor, I would hope someone out there would help us fight back…and not just encourage my people to surrender.

                Would this have been your advice to the Vietnamese when the Americans invaded their country? On the surface, they didn’t stand much of a chance either…so why didn’t they just give up and let the US take what they wanted, in order to “save more lives”? Why would any country resist being invaded by a hostile foreign power? By this logic, the aggressor should always win…and no one would ever be safe.

                • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Ukraine’s 2014 coup d’etat brought US-backed fascists into power, which fractured the country into a civil war. The oblasts in the east and south sought independence in order to escape the ensuing ethnic persecution, but in response, fascist paramilitaries invaded the donbass and escalated it to violent ethnic cleansing. Eight years of attempted ceasefires were broken by the West[1] before Russia finally intervened.

                  “8 Years Before” Donbass Documentary


                  1. https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2023/02/10/ukraine-zelensky-minsk-peace-russia/ ↩︎

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    What fractured the country into civil war, was Russia annexing Crimea during the Euromaidan revolt.

                  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    You do know that you would be killed in Russia for showing your pronouns, right?

                    So why do you keep simping for their propaganda?

                    Ukraine has been sovereign since 1990. They are not a part of Russia anymore since then.

                    So even if your fascism misinformation was correct, it still wouldn’t give Russia the right to invade.

                • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Ukraine was independent before it was couped in 2014 by the US and pushed to fight against Russia, intentionally breaking agreements with Russia and fomenting war precisely so it could be carved up by the US and the EU and turned into a neo-colony. If my country was being invaded by the country my leadership was instigating a war with for years, agreeing to treaties and then intentionally breaking them, multiple times in the decade prior to the invasion, while said leadership is blatantly profiting off of it, I would certainly blame my own government for inciting such a situation, and plenty of Ukrainians do.

                  Comparing Vietnam to Ukraine is such a fucking cracker take that it must hurt your arm. Vietnam was colonized and brutalized by France and then invaded by the US, two nations which are thousands of miles away and otherwise had no base of support in the region. They were fighting an actual people’s war of liberation against a force who had literally taken over more or less the entire nation, enslaving it for a century. Ukraine didn’t even exist until the fall of the Soviet Union and has been a corrupt oligarchy since. Liberals are so clueless yet so confident in showing how they refuse to learn a single thing.

                  • Archangel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    I know a lot of Ukrainians…many who were students at the time of the Maiden protests. It had nothing to do with the US. At all. They simply didn’t want their country taken over by Russia again.

                    Prior to 2014, Ukraine was already moving away from Russian influence. The Yanukovych government actually represented a reversal of policy that went back over 2 decades, since Ukraine first declared its independence from Russia. Once he was ousted, Ukraine went back to the direction it had been heading, before he changed that course. That wasn’t a coup. It was the end of one.

                    Putin never approved of Ukrainian independence. He was determined to prevent Ukraine from getting closer to Europe, by any means necessary…and Yanukovich was just another attempt to sabotage that relationship. When the Ukrainians realized who he was really working for, they took to the streets in protest.

                    This wasn’t an attack on Russia, although it was an open rejection of their influence.

                    And if you actually understood anything about Ukrainian history…you would know that the comparison to Vietnam’s history, is much closer than you’re willing to admit. Ukraine has been occupied by Russia for centuries. Treated as a vassal state, and subjected to horrendous abuses at the hands of the Russian Empire, and later the Soviet Union. The ruling class in Moscow has always viewed Ukrainians as peasants and lesser people.

                    Why do you think they were so eager to be free, as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed?

                  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 days ago

                    Russia is breaking way more agreements than any other country.

                    Yes, including the US.

          • Archangel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 days ago

            He could make it so no people die, just by calling off the invasion. If he hasn’t done it by now, what makes you think that’s what he wants?

              • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                What isn’t serious about it?

                An invading force can withdraw from the conflict any time they want and it would end the war. Which would prevent any further deaths.

                The fact that Putin still keeps invading means he doesn’t care about the lives of Russian soldiers or the lives in the country he is invading.