The Great Heist: How Employers Have Stolen Over $50 Trillion From Workers Since 1975

https://medium.com/@hrnews1/new-report-employers-in-the-usa-have-stolen-over-50-trillion-from-workers-since-1975-6afdcfdc0e85

The largest theft in American history isn’t happening in banks or jewelry stores. It’s happening in offices, factories, restaurants, and construction sites across the country, where employers have systematically stolen over $50 trillion from workers since 1975. This isn’t hyperbole — it’s the documented result of decades of wage suppression, productivity theft, and the deliberate transfer of wealth from workers to corporate owners. The $50 Trillion Theft: Breaking Down the Numbers

The scale of this theft becomes clear when examining multiple forms of wage suppression that have operated simultaneously for nearly five decades: The Productivity-Wage Gap: $2.2 Trillion Stolen Annually

The most dramatic evidence comes from the productivity-wage gap documented by the Economic Policy Institute. From 1979 to 2021, worker productivity grew by 64.6% while hourly compensation grew by only 17.3%. This means workers are producing nearly twice as much value per hour as they did in 1979, but seeing almost none of that increase in their paychecks.

If wages had kept pace with productivity, the average worker would earn approximately $42 per hour today instead of around $23. The Economic Policy Institute estimates this gap costs workers $2.2 trillion per year in lost wages. Cumulatively since 1975, this amounts to well over $50 trillion in stolen productivity gains. Labor’s Shrinking Share: Trillions Redistributed to Capital

Federal Reserve and Bureau of Labor Statistics data reveal another dimension of this theft. Labor’s share of national income has declined from approximately 63% in the mid-20th century to just 56% today, while corporate profits have soared. This 7-percentage-point shift in a multi-trillion-dollar economy represents trillions of dollars redirected from workers’ paychecks to corporate shareholders and executives. The RAND Corporation’s Smoking Gun

A 2020 RAND Corporation study provided perhaps the most damning evidence of systematic wealth theft. Researchers found that if income growth since 1975 had been as equitable as in previous decades, the median full-time worker would earn approximately $92,000 annually instead of around $50,000. The cumulative gap for all workers exceeds $50 trillion in suppressed wages. Direct Wage Theft: The Tip of the Iceberg

While the productivity-wage gap represents the largest component of theft, direct wage theft — employers literally stealing wages already earned — adds billions more to the total. This includes:

$15 billion stolen annually through minimum wage violations, unpaid overtime, off-the-clock work, and tip theft. At least 4 million workers are illegally underpaid each year, losing an average of $3,000-$3,500 annually.

In Los Angeles fast food restaurants alone, 1 in 4 workers are illegally paid below minimum wage, costing each victim an average of $3,500 annually. In Western New York, 1,900 employers withheld $17.1 million from 23,613 workers over a single decade.

$50+ billion in total wage theft annually when including all forms of wage violations, according to Economic Policy Institute estimates. This direct theft adds over $2 trillion to the cumulative total since 1975. The Mechanisms of Theft

This massive wealth transfer didn’t happen by accident. It resulted from deliberate policy choices and corporate strategies: Union Busting and Wage Suppression

Research from Harvard and the University of Washington shows that declining unionization accounts for one-third of the rise in wage inequality. Union membership fell from 35% in the 1950s to just 10% today, eliminating workers’ primary tool for capturing productivity gains. Corporate Profit Maximization

Corporate profits as a share of GDP have doubled since the 1970s while worker wages stagnated. Companies that once shared productivity gains with workers through higher wages now capture those gains entirely as profits for shareholders and executives. Regulatory Capture and Weak Enforcement

Labor investigator staffing has hit a 52-year low, with just 611 investigators for 165 million workers — one investigator per 278,000 workers. This deliberate understaffing ensures that wage theft goes unpunished and employers face minimal consequences for violations. The Real-World Impact

This isn’t just an abstract economic debate — it’s about millions of families struggling to survive while corporate profits soar:

Housing Crisis: If wages had kept pace with productivity, median workers would earn $84,000 annually instead of $42,000, making housing affordable for millions more families.
Healthcare Bankruptcy: The $42,000 in annual income stolen from the median worker would cover health insurance premiums and medical expenses for most families.
Education Debt: Workers losing $3,000-$3,500 annually to direct wage theft could pay for college tuition or vocational training instead of going into debt.
Retirement Security: The $50 trillion stolen from workers since 1975 would have provided retirement security for an entire generation.

The Enforcement Charade

The current enforcement system is designed to enable theft, not prevent it. While property crimes worth millions receive massive law enforcement attention, wage theft worth tens of billions goes largely ignored:

Understaffed Agencies: Some states have just one investigator for every 500,000 workers; four states have no investigators based in-state.
Weak Penalties: Employers often face penalties less than what they saved by stealing wages, making theft profitable.
Retaliation: Up to 98% of low-wage workers subject to forced arbitration never pursue stolen wages, knowing they’ll face job loss and legal costs they can’t afford.
Minimal Recovery: Only $1.5 billion in stolen wages were recovered between 2021–2023, representing less than 1% of the estimated $150+ billion stolen during that period.

Corporate Criminals

Major corporations appear repeatedly on wage violation lists, treating theft as a business strategy:

AT&T: 34 different wage and hour violations totaling $140 million in penalties since 2000
Walmart: Hundreds of millions in wage theft settlements
Amazon: Systematic wage theft affecting hundreds of thousands of workers

For these companies, wage theft penalties are simply a cost of doing business — a small price to pay for stealing billions from workers. The Bigger Picture: Class Warfare

The $50 trillion theft represents the largest upward transfer of wealth in American history. It’s not a bug in the system — it’s a feature. Corporate America has successfully:

Decoupled wages from productivity through union busting and political influence
Captured regulatory agencies to ensure minimal enforcement
Shifted national income from workers to capital owners
Normalized wage theft as acceptable business practice

This systematic theft has created unprecedented inequality, with the top 1% capturing nearly all productivity gains while working families struggle with stagnant wages despite producing more value than ever. Reclaiming What Was Stolen

The $50 trillion theft isn’t inevitable — it’s the result of policy choices that can be reversed:

Strengthen Labor Enforcement: Hire thousands of investigators, impose criminal penalties for wage theft, and protect workers who report violations.

Restore Collective Bargaining: Make union organizing easier and require employers to negotiate in good faith.

Link Wages to Productivity: Implement policies ensuring workers share in the value they create.

Criminal Penalties: Treat wage theft like the grand larceny it is, with prison sentences for repeat offenders.

Wealth Redistribution: Use progressive taxation to reclaim some of the stolen wealth and invest in public services that benefit workers. The Crime of the Century

The theft of $50 trillion from American workers since 1975 represents the largest property crime in world history. It has impoverished millions, destroyed communities, and created a feudal economy where workers produce enormous wealth but receive subsistence wages.

This isn’t a natural economic phenomenon — it’s organized theft enabled by corrupt politicians, captured regulators, and a legal system that prioritizes corporate profits over worker rights.

The evidence is overwhelming: productivity gains that should have gone to workers have been systematically stolen by employers for nearly five decades.

The time for polite economic debate is over. American workers have been robbed of $50 trillion, and it’s time to treat this theft with the seriousness it deserves.

Nothing less than a complete restructuring of economic power will restore what has been stolen and prevent future theft on this scale.

Data sources: Economic Policy Institute, RAND Corporation, Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Harvard University, University of Washington, and numerous academic studies documenting the systematic theft of worker productivity and wages since 1975.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is why wealth needs to be capped.

    Billionaires should not exist, and we’ll soon start to see trillionaires in the next 5 years.

    • crank0271@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      [Some] People treat extreme wealth as if it’s some law of nature, when in fact the current system is broken to the extent that it allows and enables it. The system isn’t healthy. If one’s personal health were so out of whack, many of us would do what we have to do to fix it. Why wouldn’t we do the same with our social and economic systems? There’s no Divine Right of Billionaires.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        when in fact the current system is broken to the extent that it allows and enables it.

        I’d go as far as to say that the current system rewards it.

  • DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m in complete agreement with this perspective, but rarely do I see discussions like this address the sticking point centrists and conservatives get hung up on: they don’t believe this is “theft.”

    When I told my coworker about the historic productivity-to-wages gap, she argued (paraphrasing), “Could it not be that gap is reflective of the CEOs innovating ways to make their workers increasingly productive, while the value of those workers’ labor hasn’t actually increased, therefore explaining why the minds behind those innovations deserve the wealth?”

    This conversation will go nowhere if we keep throwing around terms like “wage theft” and skipping step 1 where we argue the moral determination as to why that is true.

    • greenskye@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah. There was a post the other day about a CEO that got a 1.2B payout and then gave her staff a first class ticket and $10k in cash. The cost amount to less than 1% of the payout for selling the company that those same staff helped make successful.

      And everyone was arguing about how the CEO didn’t have to give anything at all, so complaining about any of it was just being greedy. Totally ignoring the fact that there’s no way the CEO represented 99.5% of the effort to make the company successful.

      They don’t even see it as a problem and seem happy with whatever minor crumbs the rich are willing to hand out, totally ignoring that what they’ve been handed is a tiny fraction of what was stolen.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      No but there’s literal theft as in withholding pay that they are contractually obligated to give. Not theft in the Marxist sense

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Companies that once shared productivity gains with workers through higher wages now capture those gains entirely as profits for shareholders and executives.

    My own employer used to be a mid-sized company excelling in the specific service they offered. I worked there for five years while they kept growing and things just kept getting gradually “better”. Then, during Covid, the owner decided to sell to a multinational and almost immediately we lost bonuses, incentives, perks and tools. They kept growing the sales department (and the actual sales) without growing support or backoffice.

    As a result we are massively overworked, have less tools than we ever did before (or they just don’t work anymore) and our deadlines have tightened significantly without new hires in the dept.

    Our choice is to grin & bear it and keep a roof over our heads, or to protest it and lose all income.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is about $150,000 per person currently in the United States.

    Not household. Not worker. Not adult. Not citizen. Person.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    James 5:1-6, NRSV

    Come now, you rich people, weep and wail for the miseries that are coming to you. Your riches have rotted, and your clothes are moth-eaten. Your gold and silver have rusted, and their rust will be evidence against you, and it will eat your flesh like fire. You have laid up treasure during the last days. Listen! The wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, cry out, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have lived on the earth in luxury and in pleasure; you have nourished your hearts in a day of slaughter. You have condemned and murdered the righteous one, who does not resist you.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    And America ain’t gonna do anything about it. In fact they get off on it. Tread on them harder.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This ONLY happened because we TAXED them! If we ELIMINATE their Taxes that $50TRILLION will TRICKLE back Down to us in the Forms of SOMETHING!

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    it would be awesome if a CEO of a retail store sued for wage theft was handled like a shoplifter on instagram

    but wage theft is not a crime

    but trying to steal a string trimmer is

  • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would contend that using hyperbolic language like this only serves to provide an easy excuse to dismiss the topic being discussed. Most people will not consider this as stolen money because the wage was agreed upon. Yes, I agree with the position that our system doesn’t afford workers the power and resources they need to be on an equal footing when negotiating salary. I agree that such an imbalance in negotiating power is coercive. The title should be, “Employers have suppressed the growth of wages by 50 trillions dollars since 1975”.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      As I’ve said in another comment, this post is not about declining real wages but about companies not paying their workers the amount they said they would, sometimes not at all. It’s literal theft.

      • Dubiousx99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The article does mention the 50 billion dollar figure about actual theft, but the headline and the majority of the article are discussion the suppression of wages.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No, it mixes up “legal” wage suppression with plainly illegal wage theft, that’s the problem. It speaks of both in the same breath, and that’s damaging.

    • DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Precisely this. Leftist rhetoric about wages is often framed for other leftists, without addressing the core arguments underpinning centrist and conservative views on why the rich “deserve” their wealth. People say “theft” without making arguments for why our definition of theft needs to change.