• abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Just talked to a woman from a company in the same holding as mine. They still run their computers on windows xp. They’re in health care and deal with sensitive, confidential patient data.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The criticality of any given service is inversely proportional to how recently released was the technology that it runs on.

      This, if you see some ancient machine sitting there humming, don’t even make eye contact with that mf, don’t even think about it. In fact, try to minimize your time in the same room so when it eventually goes tits up, you don’t get blamed.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      This week I heard from a network group lead of a university hospital, that they have a similar issue. Some medical devices that come with control computers can’t be upgraded, because they were only certified for medical use with the specific software they came with.

      They just isolate those devices as much as possible on the network, not much else to do, when there is no official support and recertification for upgrading. And of course nobody wants to spend half a million on a new imaging device when the old one is still fine except for the OS of the control computer.

      Sounds like a shitty place to be, I pity those guys.

      That said, if you were talking about normal client computers then it’s inexcusable.