• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Well, consulting is often used because they need an answer to a question. That may be open-ended like:

    “What moves should we make to expand our business?”

    But other times they just want confirmation:

    “Should we merge with Discovery?” (Sure, I guess. Here are some reasons you could. cha-ching)

    “Should we split with Discovery?” (Sure, I guess. Here are some reasons you could. cha-ching)

    Other times they just need to pay people to give them excuses to lay off people. McKinsey’s always available for that.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      When Chipotle got a new CEO (Brian Niccol, who has since become the Starbucks CEO) a few years back, they were headquartered in Denver. But the CEO lived in Newport Beach. So they brought in a consulting management firm to examine where the best place in the country was for them to have their corporate headquarters.

      After weeks of analysis - surprise, surprise - they determined that the best place they could possibly have a corporate headquarters was in Newport Beach, where the CEO lived.

      So they fired most of their corporate workers and moved the office to be closer to the CEOs house.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I have experienced this where I work. There is a consulting company that gets rolled out to make packets full of “data”, graphs, summaries, and surveys that always manages to support the unpopular thing the boss wants.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        12 hours ago

        “Sorry we don’t do remote work and you’ll have to come into the office.”

        “Counterpoint: …”

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      McKinsey:

      For when you have no fucking clue how to do your job, and want authoritative, plausible deniability about that.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Obviously you should keep paying my $1.3 million annual salary. We just paid McKinsey $30 million to say how vital my department is

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Other times they just need to pay people to give them excuses to lay off people. McKinsey’s always available for that.

      What would you say… you do here?

      • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Look, I already told you: I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don’t have to. I have people skills. I am good at dealing with people! Can’t you understand that!? What the hell is wrong with you people!!

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Get paid to do the work of someone who could be employed for a reasonable salary, but the board or CEO wants the answer to come from someone outside the company to avoid taking any blame.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How should we defend Athens?

      Consultancy says “A wooden wall will save Athens”

      We’ve been doing this forever…