• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    TLC used to be The Learning Channel. Before it was “here’s a bunch of children who are being sexually abused behind the camera,” it was educational outreach. Vocational training. Satellite college courses for people in Alaska and Appalachia.

    Then Discovery bought it. Fuck Discovery.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      Yep. I thought for ages that it was a spinoff of discovery but no, it was a whole thing that went back to the 80s. After Discovery acquired it blam.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Why do I associate TLC with, like, Trading Spaces and other domestic not-quite-a-game shows like that? Am I conflating it with something else? Also I haven’t had “television” in decades now.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Because that’s the slop it turned into. It was a place for documentaries and educational content, just like MTV used to have music. But watching Kate torment her brood of children or Honey BooBoo eat sketti makes the kind of money airing a college lecture doesn’t.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In, fire 30 percent of the workforce, new logo, boom, out.

    You are now a fully trained management consultant.

    • MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      “Certainly Sir! Money well spent!”

      You have to understand why they are employed though - somebody stands to gain from doing some thing, so the way they get to justify doing that thing is to hire these people, so they come in, deliver a report that says the thing is the best thing to do with graphs that go up, and it happens, McKinsey gets paid, the beneficiary gets what they want and life goes on.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That plus there’s a massive incentive for overpaid executives to farm out any actual decision-making to consultants. They could lose their cushy jobs if they did something unpopular that made the news and hurt stock prices. But if the decision was promoted by an expensive consulting firm, that launders the blame. It hurts the business in a fundamental way, obviously, but publicly traded companies have not been very focused on fundamentals up until lately. Tighter monetary policy should have changed this, but the paradigm has been slow to shift for many.

    • Auth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That would unironically be good advice which means he couldnt give it.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean no need to spread misinformation. This information in easily verifiable.

        Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, worked at McKinsey for ~2 years and then joined Google in 2004, eventually working his way into the position of CEO.

        Pichai’s fuck ups are unlikely a result of McKinsey, at least not directly. That isn’t to say that McKinsey is completely off the hook. They work with plenty of “top” companies and I’m certain Google is one of them.

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Consulting services are vital because they improving corporate synergy by utilizing market solutions and relocating potential where it is needed most.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Well, consulting is often used because they need an answer to a question. That may be open-ended like:

    “What moves should we make to expand our business?”

    But other times they just want confirmation:

    “Should we merge with Discovery?” (Sure, I guess. Here are some reasons you could. cha-ching)

    “Should we split with Discovery?” (Sure, I guess. Here are some reasons you could. cha-ching)

    Other times they just need to pay people to give them excuses to lay off people. McKinsey’s always available for that.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      When Chipotle got a new CEO (Brian Niccol, who has since become the Starbucks CEO) a few years back, they were headquartered in Denver. But the CEO lived in Newport Beach. So they brought in a consulting management firm to examine where the best place in the country was for them to have their corporate headquarters.

      After weeks of analysis - surprise, surprise - they determined that the best place they could possibly have a corporate headquarters was in Newport Beach, where the CEO lived.

      So they fired most of their corporate workers and moved the office to be closer to the CEOs house.

      • BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I have experienced this where I work. There is a consulting company that gets rolled out to make packets full of “data”, graphs, summaries, and surveys that always manages to support the unpopular thing the boss wants.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        11 hours ago

        “Sorry we don’t do remote work and you’ll have to come into the office.”

        “Counterpoint: …”

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      McKinsey:

      For when you have no fucking clue how to do your job, and want authoritative, plausible deniability about that.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Obviously you should keep paying my $1.3 million annual salary. We just paid McKinsey $30 million to say how vital my department is

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Other times they just need to pay people to give them excuses to lay off people. McKinsey’s always available for that.

      What would you say… you do here?

      • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Look, I already told you: I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don’t have to. I have people skills. I am good at dealing with people! Can’t you understand that!? What the hell is wrong with you people!!

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Get paid to do the work of someone who could be employed for a reasonable salary, but the board or CEO wants the answer to come from someone outside the company to avoid taking any blame.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How should we defend Athens?

      Consultancy says “A wooden wall will save Athens”

      We’ve been doing this forever…

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    On the other hand, they’re grifting Zaslav, who is possibly the worst person in show business, so…maybe let them cook.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        For this sort of job, you need to be born to rich parents, get sent to a ivy league college, skip classes and make connections. Then you can start a business selling fake services to the stupid.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Do this, do that, now go back the way you started. That’ll be $155 million. Be sure to smash that Like button and don’t forget to Subscribe!

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I don’t know who this person is but something tells me he is the son of a wealthy family who has connections to all of those brands.

    How far off am i?

    That job does not sound like a real job, it sounds like a job title that is a thinly veiled excuse to arrange perpetual exclusive socialism for the rich.

    Thank you for reading my analysis, the bill, regardless wether i am correct is about 69.420mil

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You aint wrong, McKinsey is the ultimate job farm for mid grade nepo babies and/or elite school graduates.

      For example, Ursula von der Leyen hired McKinsey for German Army re-org…

      then both of her children got plush jobs at the firm, her daughters 3 years there then leveraged into elite degree a Stanford

      https://fsi.stanford.edu/people/johanna-von-der-leyen

      Johanna joins the Ford Dorsey Master’s in International Policy from McKinsey’s Sustainability Practice. During her 3.5 years at the management consultancy, she advised private sector clients from various industries on sustainability strategies and developed reports on climate risk with the McKinsey Global Institute. During her parental leave from McKinsey, she received a Master of Philosophy in Environmental Policy from the University of Cambridge (UK). She also holds a bachelor’s degree in Politics and Economics from the University of Münster. At Stanford, Johanna hopes to deepen her knowledge in integrating environmental policies into the dynamics of international policymaking. Her academic interests also include nature- and climate-related risk assessment and adaptation, and particularly the role of nature-based solutions. Johanna is an outdoor enthusiast, a passionate dressage rider who participated in competitions on the highest national level in Germany, and she enjoys running and gardening in her spare time.

      There is a club, and most people see it before their eyes and still somehow manage to not see it for it is.

      Just work harder!

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Wait, she went on parental leave from her job, as in having a newborn baby, and used that time to get a master’s degree? Either the baby didn’t spend much time with mom or the degree is a joke, because I have a really hard time imagining having the energy to work on a serious master’s degree in a year or less while taking care of an infant!

  • ninjabard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So, this bastard and Zaslav are the reason I can’t watch older seasons of Expeditions Unknown on HBOMax. Fuck 'em both.