• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yup. Characters should remain consistent if it’s important.

    Tonto should not have been played by Johnny Depp. Gross.

    The original Ancient One was a poor stereotype of a Tibetan person and Tilda Swinton is cool so I’m ok with this one.

    Liam Neeson is a great actor with a ton of gravitas and he pulled off the role well, but yeah shoulda found a middle eastern dude. Maybe that hot Djin dude from American Gods can be the next Ras Al Ghul.

    Anything to do with Scarlet Witch’s background is a retcon, she was originally introduced as Magneto’s moustache twirling daughter. Despite her tan in the referenced photo she’s more often depicted as white, but I could see her being middle eastern, but it would make sense that she’s half Jewish at least, given her father’s background.

    Lastly, she’s a fucking mermaid. Who gives a shit? How many of the dude bros bitching even watched it?

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    If it’s bad to use white actors for black (or other colored) roles then it’s bad for black actors to do white roles. If it’s okay to do those switches then it’s okay for all. Forget colors it shouldn’t matter.

    Having said that, Disney just did the Ariel thing ffor the “look at us being sooooo progressive, please give us your money for this utterly shit movie” instead of trying to just make a great movie

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think people need to figure out if the race of a character is culturally significant in any way in the context of the story and IRL. Like, part of Black Panther’s whole deal is he’s from Africa. Hard to budge on that character’s ethnicity. Ariel from the Little Mermaid could literally be any ethnicity and the story would remain the same. Crying about white erasure is pathetic when no actual culture relevant to white western people is being lost.

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      A big issue here, especially with the MCU stuff, is that it’s not a skin color thing with those changes. They updated the whole character in order to make them into races that are more friendly to China. They’ve done this repeatedly and stripped identities and character traits from characters over and over again.

      Every single Romani character that’s appeared in an MCU movie has had their heritage removed and replaced with generic white. Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver are good examples (since they’re the ones in the meme) but I don’t see any way that Robert Downey Jr is going to be able to do the complicated Romani backstory of Dr Doom very well.

      I agree that Ariel was swapped for marketing reasons (and arguably specifically to cause outrage and get people talking) Ariel doesn’t have a racial heritage that plays into her life and identity… She’s a mermaid from the sea… Not a member of a group with a large history of being discriminated against.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe that’s for the best? It’s a bit weird that MCU went so big on Romani people in specific. That said unless a Romani person identifies themselves, you’re going to have trouble picking them out of a crowd. They are as diverse as the regions they’ve traveled through.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The virtue signaling just backfires. “Rainbow washing” is a thing now. Companies never gave a fuck about a progressive message, they care about trendy things to cash in on.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I get the impression Ben and Jerry’s does actually care bout progressive issues, but they are that rare exception.

        • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s too bad they don’t have ownership of their company any longer. They sold B&J to Unilever and now they have a reduced platform to share progressive values. Any progressivism out of Unilever is cynical corporate pandering.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      The original actress/singer for Ariel absolutely dominated that role as well, and really the whole cast was damn near perfect. It’s one of the few Disney Princess movies that should have been left alone.

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Literally every single live action remake that Disney has created has been inferior in every single way to the originals. Aladdin, The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, all terrible cash-grabby productions (esp. TLK, good lord it’s bad).

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s definitely a cynical move by Disney no matter how you slice it.

      • “If you think we’re super woke, you go support the movie. We get money.”

      • “If you hate it (because we thought a superficial change would cover the fact we barely tried), it’s because you’re a nasty racist bigotface, your opinion is disregarded, galvanizes our first crowd into giving us more money, and angry actually-racist bloggers probably hate-watch it while advertising it for free. We get money.”

      Ain’t the culture wars grand (if you’re selling to both sides like a proper arms dealer)? :D

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I personally think it isn’t wise to use an actor of any race in substitute of another, if that character’s race is part of the story. The only reason I could think of to change the character’s race, gender, status, etc. would perhaps be to tell a different story, but then it should be renamed and be a different story. But if a character’s race, gender, status, etc. is tied to that character’s story, then it shouldn’t be discarded frivolously.

      From what I see, I feel that a lot of the disconnect is based on whether people find an attribute (in this case, race) important or not as part of the character’s story.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I feel I half agree with you. The other half of me thinks, there’s a lot of things we change for an actor acting a character. After all, it’s an actor, playing a character. Someone called Ben can play a guy called John; your grumpiest aunt can play a sweet grandma; often we have actors in their 30s and 40s playing ternagers and 20s; and men playing women even used to be a thing.

        I think you have a good point, but I also think it’s okay to have an acceptable disconnect of, this is people acting out a story, not the real thing happening in front of me.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I absolutely remember people being mad about the first one.

    The others not so much. The fantasy movies don’t really matter the same way as a historical movie about slavery does. The fantasy characters are even gender swapped without a problem at conventions.

    And yes that means the racists who got mad about Ariel are dumb.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wait until you tell extremist, right-wing Christians that Jesus wasn’t a white guy! Oooohhh boyyy!

    Also, I think it’s important to not forget that in the internet age, a very small minority of hateful asshats can appear to have a very large voice. They are still a very small, minority group of asshats.

  • Focal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I feel like there’s a lot of cherry picking here too, because if we take the MCU, it also does some race swapping that nobody has a problem with.

    Nick Fury is one, but Samuel L Jackson is so cool in that role, it doesn’t matter.

    Heimdal is another one. Norse mythology, probably not a lot of black there, but Idris Elba is also so damn cool in the role that it does not really matter, and I’ve never heard anyone complain about these people.

    I think in general it’s more about if the people in the roles do a good job or not. Tilda Swinton did a great job. Johnny Depp… Maybe not so much, but I also do remember people were mad about that one.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fun fact about the Lone Ranger, the most likely real world basis for the protagonist is a man named Bass Reeves. He was black, and an escaped slave. The misrepresentation has been present since the beginning, if I’m not mistaken.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    My issue is that we are pairing nationality with skin color or ethnicity here. Those are not mutually exclusive. There are 2nd or 3rd generation Asians immigrants in Mexico, just as there are Mexicans living in Ireland, and Irish people in India, etc… Somebody could be a fully integrated national but not part if the nations major ethnicity. Even saying AFRICAN-American is kind of pointless, like it matters where your grand-grand-grand-grand-parents came from. They’re as much American as anybody else. We don’t call everybody else European-American for comparison.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      In movies meant to be historically accurate though it would be very weird to switch things up. Especially when so much was based on appearance at certain times.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Tbh I’m perfectly fine with other races picking up any roles, except for historical movies.

      Another thing on historical movies that irk me to no end is the perfect posh English for every effing Roman or Greek movies

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Somewhat relevant to your second point, I don’t like it when they speak English and it doesn’t make sense.

        Breaking Bad bothered me so much with how often the native Spanish speakers were talking in English, while in Mexico, with other native Spanish speakers. It isn’t like they didn’t allow Spanish in the show, there was a fair amount, they just arbitrarily decided that the scenes where it made the most sense to speak Spanish that English was the right language.

    • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      AFRICAN-American

      Well, that started out as a euphemism for “black” because some people decided that made them uncomfortable… Of course in the literal sense, Elon Musk is African American, even though everyone knows that’s not what’s intended…

  • borgertwo@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Believe me, white folk do get offended about non-white characters being changed to white, in fact they the most likely ones to be offended, especially when it comes to historic figures. All this meme is doing is framing an inaccurate depiction of white folk to suit a biased narrative. Keep in mind also, a minority few cannot represent an entirety. Just as all black or asian folk are not alike, same holds true for white folk. This an era where a difference in race is not the concern, but rather the upper class rich people that use ethnic label stereotyping to have us fight among each other as distraction. Don’t fall for their trickery of dividing us.

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I complain about all of it. Yeah I’m sure it “doesn’t affect the story” for most things, but I feel either get someone who is the correct race or make a new character.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    That funny because when I put my non-USA definition of is white and not-white or african, this image as absolutely no meaning.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Even after the white washing debate we got the biggest white wash ever. The Indian ruler of Asia Khan noonien Singh, played by the whitest man in existence. Benedict Cumberbatch.

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I honestly don’t care at this point. New Ariel sucks not because they switched her to black, but because it just sucks as a whole. The only thing that’s actually kinda pissing me off is…

    …could we stop swapping gingers with blacks? Please? Pretty please? Both are minority, ffs. But one is even kinda rarer than the other. Go on, switch the blondie, but leave the ginger as ginger ;-;

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    if white is being used this generically then romani should be listed as white and arab should be middle eastern and tibetan asian if not lumping both as asian.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean tbf, all of the above have people enraged and people who dgaf, it’s just those flip flop depending. I’m sure there’s no shortage of people here, in this very thread, that aren’t cool with say Native Americans being played by white people, or that Scarlet Johansen played that one lady from GITS (can’t remember her name, never really got into that series, but she’s supposed to be Asian.) Understandably so, really, but still.

    I take it a step further personally, stop remaking anything and if you adapt say a comic or book, stick as close as humanly possible to the source material. Race/genderswapping and reboots for a moneygrab is cool or whatever but can we have good original stories again please?

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      My issue with Scarlet funnily enough is that she’s Scarlet. She’s too big of a star to really meld into the majors role. I just felt like I was watching black widow on screen. Sorta spoilers for anyone who cares but

      Tap for spoiler

      the majors body is full on robot so technically she could be any nationality and color but it would have fit better if they picked someone who fit her original motif since it sorta matters. With the whole, ghost in the machine thing. I’m a huge fan of the franchise and I’m sad that this was the big live action debut.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I can get behind that too, but I was referring to the backlash at the time it was released, it was all “cast people of that race to play a character of that race because inclusion is good.” Iirc there was one around the same time that played a trans person but wasn’t a trans person who received backlash too.